clintrubber
Well-known member
Hi Rossi,
Thanks for the reaction.
I've been looking at the various Zooms (H2, H4N) and they sure look tempting,
the ease of setup and also the quick file transfer is nice (need to do a
real-time S/PDIF transfer from digital recorder to DAW now).
But while most 'easy recorders' will give totally usable results w.r.t.
hearing what was played, one can get spoilt/curious/etc... and I got the
(probably not fully correct) impression that these recorders go far w.r.t.
sound-quality, but separate decent (...) microphones will still give you a
better/fuller/whatever sound. (But haven't tried any of them myself yet.)
But regardless of which medium & recorder, I got also/mainly curious to
how this kind of situation would be best recorded, in terms of number of
mics (preferrably just 2), positioning & last-but-not-least which polar-patterns.
Toying around with the various setups is both some hassle as well as a further
learning experience for me w.r.t. mic-technique.
Bye,
Peter
Thanks for the reaction.
I've been looking at the various Zooms (H2, H4N) and they sure look tempting,
the ease of setup and also the quick file transfer is nice (need to do a
real-time S/PDIF transfer from digital recorder to DAW now).
But while most 'easy recorders' will give totally usable results w.r.t.
hearing what was played, one can get spoilt/curious/etc... and I got the
(probably not fully correct) impression that these recorders go far w.r.t.
sound-quality, but separate decent (...) microphones will still give you a
better/fuller/whatever sound. (But haven't tried any of them myself yet.)
But regardless of which medium & recorder, I got also/mainly curious to
how this kind of situation would be best recorded, in terms of number of
mics (preferrably just 2), positioning & last-but-not-least which polar-patterns.
Toying around with the various setups is both some hassle as well as a further
learning experience for me w.r.t. mic-technique.
Bye,
Peter