DrFrankencopter
Well-known member
etheory said:This is what most plug-in developers do, and it really annoys me.
It's simply not enough.
To get the proper operation, you need to model the rectifier, since that is a part of the threshold (since you lose one diode drop at that point), along with the proper release and attack circuits, then the LED for the opto needs to be properly modelled, since it's the second part of the threshold (another diode drop) and is highly non-linear (it follows a Lambert W curve). Then you need to model the optical element properly (which I've done by measuring the real thing) to get the right gain response.
I still don't see it. Sure, the diode drop establishes the threshold for compression, I totally see that, but does it need a spice model or do you just set a thresh value of 0.7V and get on with it. As for attack and release, they are simple RC circuits, and can be modelled with 1st order low pass transfer functions.
The Vactrol is nonlinear, and is deserving of a more elaborate treatment, but does it need a physical model? What is wrong with simply using the mfg's curves? How well does your model match the mfg data, or your own data?
I'm down with the idea of modelling the functional bits of the circuit, but I don't think SPICE level detail models are necessary for a sidechain circuit. I'd save the detailed modelling for the audio path....
But hey, like you say YMMV....
Cheers
Kris