G
Guest
Guest
[quote author="mediatechnology"]
Sort of like the one posted above your reply. (Which you probably didn't see because we posted at the same time.)[/quote]
Yep, very similar approach. I use an opamp with diodes in feedbeck, then opamp with hi-V transistor with common base plus an emitter follower as a half-wave rectifier (however, a current mirror plus one more transistor will give full-wave rectification, but I am happy with that since I have also LEDs in screen grid current sensors of output toobs to indicate clipping (peaks of screen grid current is the best indicator).
One capacitor connected to emitter of that hi-V emitter follower is for peak rectifications; 10 times bigger cap with resistor in series averages rectified signal. Why hi-V transistors? Because it drives directly grid of EM-80 magic eye (I don't use a triode from it, it would need too high voltage swing from opamp.)
(I use log conversion before rectification).
Sort of like the one posted above your reply. (Which you probably didn't see because we posted at the same time.)[/quote]
Yep, very similar approach. I use an opamp with diodes in feedbeck, then opamp with hi-V transistor with common base plus an emitter follower as a half-wave rectifier (however, a current mirror plus one more transistor will give full-wave rectification, but I am happy with that since I have also LEDs in screen grid current sensors of output toobs to indicate clipping (peaks of screen grid current is the best indicator).
One capacitor connected to emitter of that hi-V emitter follower is for peak rectifications; 10 times bigger cap with resistor in series averages rectified signal. Why hi-V transistors? Because it drives directly grid of EM-80 magic eye (I don't use a triode from it, it would need too high voltage swing from opamp.)