ruffrecords said:
I certainly would not put the BBC in the 'fact reporting' category.
Cheers
Ian
I recall listening to the Beeb with short wave radio back in the 1950s, they were authoritative back then, especially compared to Radio Moscow, or Radio Havana, Cuba. :
Since then they seem inflicted with the same compulsion to tell people what to think about events, so much so that they started a broadcast service dedicated for the N. America market... No thank you
=====
It seems like the polls declaring that VP Joe Biden had a 9% lead were more than a little off. :
Looks like record turn out and record "spending", but if money alone could buy elections we'd be looking at President Mike Bloomberg. :'(
We need to look out for funny business with mail in vote counting. I can understand waiting until the election to not waste effort if the vote isn't even close but why would a state suspend counting during an undecided vote? PA resumed counting this morning but Nevada is not reporting more results until Thursday. I can not think of any "good" reason to delay reporting votes, we can easily imagine bad reasons.
Looks like a January 5th run off for at least one GA senate seat when none of the candidates got 50%. (There was an item on the MS ballot this year asking to suspend 50% requirement.)
It appears that many businesses voted by putting up plywood, and rioters in some western states did not even wait for a final decision.
I remain optimistic about an honest count but appearances are a little suspicious. The integrity of our vote is very important. Inexplicable delays are not building public confidence.
I can imagine some attention harvesting by being the squeaky wheel, that holds up the decision.
JR
PS: The voting system used in MS, paper ballots with optical readers confirming a readable ballot on the spot before accepting it. This still leaves an opening for hacking computerized counts and reporting, but the paper ballot remains as a robust backup for manual recounts if required.