scott2000
Well-known member
Yeah. I guess they aren't updating that report anymore for whatever reason?Naturally, the report does not estimate the Covid treatment expenses that the programme has saved (monoclonal, dexa, pain relief etc etc), nor does it estimate how many (small) businesses in the UK it has saved.
Interesting about the S antibody levels in relation to positive or negative N samples even though it isn't clear where the Delta variant plays into their charts. . It would be interesting to know what is deemed a protective level of S because the N positive sample group was killing it from the start. Quickly looking I've only seen references to negative vs positive S levels in relation to infection/protection, etc but nothing on what is considered adequate yet. But I've just started looking.
I mean 10000 plus S levels sure seems cool like iron man but, what minimum constitutes protection ?