DerEber said:
You can add rubberbands to change timings.
Yes it was on the paper notes, as different fader caps with different weight...
But timing still slow due to mechanical inertia so I don't think I will go for mechanical constrain for timing
also to not over stress the belt...
Timing test is on the way, attack is about 30ms right now fastest possible move, release ca by anything longer than 30ms, by side chain tuning.
In this smashed drum room test, direct signal is delayed from SC signal at DAW, fader inserted in the console
abbey road d enfer said:
The big advantage is that, due to solid friction, there is a form of hysteresis that cannot be implemented in analog electronics. That results in reduced (even sometimes eliminated) control-voltage ripple-induced distortion (at LF).
Brilliant implementation!
Not sure to get what you say about hysteresis ?
I appreciate your words !
drawback:
-how fader will react in long term with this kind of constant stress
-no make up gain if I still want a passive processing (no issue in my usecase)
-fast attack not possible, this one will be more an "auto leveller" than a "compressor"
Thanks to all !!
I have some more test to perform before calling this a real tool.
Do you guys think it's an interesting design ? I mean for real application ?
For the moment I'm splited... I do it for the challenging concept, but as is it work better than expected so...I'll think I go further
Best
Zam