M
mattiasNYC
Guest
JohnRoberts said:Yes I've been to vegas and trust me they are watching every move inside the casinos... If patrons demand security they will get it, but i am just speculating...
Of course, if there's a sufficient amount of people demanding metal detectors they'll do it. But just consider an average visitor;
- You get to the airport in your hometown; metal detectors etc...
- You get off the plane feeling dirty, at hotel another detector / search for check in
- You go out for a meal, come back to the room... searches...
- You go out to gamble, come back... searches...
etc
Even if they started doing that I think it'd be a problem because people would be annoyed.
JohnRoberts said:PS: Rather than attacking the integrity of the tens of millions of Trump voters (roughly half the voting population), maybe evaluate all the political elite who both underestimated him, and misread the mood of the electorate who are fed up with the status quo.
Trump was never underestimated. What was underestimated was the chances of him winning, in part because some politicians overestimated the American voting public.
Trump voters don't care if he lies or speaks the truth, if he insults ethnic minorities or religious minorities, if he cozies up with white supremacists during the campaign trail and then says some are very fine people... They seem more worried about not having to be "PC".
To you it's a set of different priorities, and to me that's duly noted. But I'm brown skinned, so I actually give a crap about these sorts of things.
Like I said: To those who still are Trump supporters there don't seem to be a line that he can cross that would make them give up support. I don't know if it's indoctrination, stupidity or actual conviction that's behind it... or something else. But I really do believe that people, like you, would as he said still support him even if he went out on the street in broad daylight and shot a person. "People" would want to wait for news about what really happened, because the liberal mainstream media is full of "fake news", and people like Pucho would probably post some ludicrous completely unsubstantiated claim from some nutty outlet placing the blame elsewhere. And then at the end it would still have been a better choice than Hillary because.... well, because f-u, that's why....