Whoops

Re: You all think this sony c800g clone will be a flop?
« Reply #20 on: February 13, 2020, 09:02:20 PM »
microphones. The sE RNT comes to mind as well, being a high quality (I guess) microphone with the corresponding price tag. I guess the buyers are out there somewhere, else they wouldn't be doing it, right?

Yes, there's definitely a market for high priced microphones but normally from manufacturers that have an high end reputation.
In your example SE was clever enough to have the Rupert Neve name there.

In the case of Golden Age, it's a company that is known for very cheap chinese Neve preamp clones.
Very cheap clones...
And now a 3800€ microphone, LOLOLOLOLOL
Doesn't seem to me their popularity is in the same market as the High End Brands (Neumann included)



xeawr

Re: You all think this sony c800g clone will be a flop?
« Reply #21 on: February 14, 2020, 06:30:42 PM »
Well regarding Golden Age - it's "Golden Age Premier" really, so that is theoretically a different brand for hq stuff, but I understand that a cheap N*** clone comes to mind when you hear the "Golden Age"...

speaking of the GAP, I kinda regret selling my 73mkIII, they did give me really nice records in a production I tracked last year. But I had some underwhelming experiences with those as well... never mind  :)

Whoops

Re: You all think this sony c800g clone will be a flop?
« Reply #22 on: February 14, 2020, 09:04:10 PM »
Well regarding Golden Age - it's "Golden Age Premier" really, so that is theoretically a different brand for hq stuff, but I understand that a cheap N*** clone comes to mind when you hear the "Golden Age"...

There's a lot of affordable microphones that are really good and perfectly capable of achieving great recordings,
all T Bone microphones come to my mind (as a lot of Chinese cheap mics)

To spend 3800€ for a mic, I need (and a studio needs) something more, I need also a Wow factor to my clients for example.
Neumann, Schoeps, DPA, Telefunken, Sony make my customers more confident. I don't need those to make good recordings, but the customer confidence is really important.

Customers will not be confident by Golden Age brand for their lead vocalist, and I will not waste session time trying to convince them that Golden Age Premier is different than Golden Age, it will be a waste of time.  Not a big enough name difference

"Just put the Neumann please"
« Last Edit: February 15, 2020, 07:32:02 AM by Whoops »

Recording Engineer

Re: You all think this sony c800g clone will be a flop?
« Reply #23 on: February 14, 2020, 10:56:51 PM »
That’s right. Pull out the Neumanns for guaranteed passable results with the bill-paying gigs that no actually cares about. Pull out all the off-brand and unbranded mics when people actually care what it sounds like. What a twisted world.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2020, 11:01:11 PM by Recording Engineer »

Whoops

Re: You all think this sony c800g clone will be a flop?
« Reply #24 on: February 15, 2020, 07:41:50 AM »
You can't make a name by making cheap clones, and getting tou Brand into the affordable market and then just release a 4000€ product, doesn't work like that from a marketing perspective.

Imagine Behringer, after so many years of consolidating  the brand's name in the economical range and normally the cheapest alternative in the store, now releasing a 100 000€ console in the SSL and Neve price range. Lololololol
Would not make sense

But off course Uli would never  make a mistake like that he is a really amazing bussiness man.

He didn't even put Behringer name in Behringers made cheap vintage gear clones, he used Klark Teknik brand. Even for the transformers Midas stickers were used.

Ricardus

Re: You all think this sony c800g clone will be a flop?
« Reply #25 on: February 15, 2020, 10:11:42 AM »
Presonus did it when they released the ADL 600 tube preamp and that sold well. But it wasn't as expensive as this clone mic.
Audio mastering for hire..

Re: You all think this sony c800g clone will be a flop?
« Reply #26 on: February 19, 2020, 09:48:10 AM »
If anybody gets their hands on this, I'd love to see what the internals look like.

It's really the capsule I want to know about. I have a feeling it's a Chinese capsule like in a lot of clone mics (I think I said this before in the thread, but frankly as long as the capsule is well made I don't care where it originates, even some Telefunkens are using the Chinese CK12 capsules now I hear). I'm also curious about how the circuit and components actually compare to the original

This price is like someone building a U87 clone using a cheap K67 capsule copy, and decent components (by which I mean not bottom of the barrel capacitors, etc), and then charging $1500. Actually, there are a lot of U87 clones using Chinese capsules that cost not quite that much, but still like $700. I'd rather just pay someone to mod an existing mic to sound like a U87 (or "U67" minus the tube) than pay that much for a clone using Chinese components. Especially when mics like the BM-600 and AKG P420 are around for cheap, and I actually really like a lot of the U87 clones people on here have built.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
12 Replies
6556 Views
Last post November 23, 2018, 01:56:19 PM
by squarewave
13 Replies
16247 Views
Last post January 23, 2015, 01:33:37 PM
by jackinthebox
40 Replies
3321 Views
Last post January 22, 2020, 01:57:53 AM
by gyraf
0 Replies
107 Views
Last post February 08, 2020, 06:56:49 PM
by Deadrecords