Chrome Heart
Well-known member
BTW, I would be using a shielded cable to carry the +24, +48 and 0V to the preamp. Looks like you have lamp cord in there.
Seems all fine. The JLM power station has 3 positive and 2 negative voltage regulators. The positive vregs LM317 have the regulated output voltage internally connected to their heatfin (and adjusting the output voltage by the respective trimmer obviously will change this voltage potential in respect to reference voltage), the negative vregs LM337 have the raw/unregulated DC voltage internally connected to their heatfin (and adjusting the output voltage by the respective trimmer should not change the voltage in front of the vreg). Your case is always connected to safety ground. You have connected your 0V reference voltage to this safety ground in one spot thru the 10R resistor, so your multimeter, set for reading DCV, would measure these voltages. (For usual you set your multimeter for reading ohms when checking for a short between vreg and case with the unit powered off).mikerl said:i have a JLM power station that i am using to power 4 ez1290's. i recently moved the power station from inside the chassis, to an external enclosure (at the same time, i switched to an avel lindberg toroidal transformer). i seem to be getting a reading, on every single regulator, when i check to ensure there is no continuity between it (the regulator plate), and the chassis (for heat sinking). the reading that i am getting changed when i turned the trim pot at the base of the respective regulator.. is there a chance that i am reading a path to ground through another path, and that i actually do not have a short on every single regulator to the heat sink?
RedRabbit said:3. I'm planning on using 1% metal film resistors primarily because that's what on my workbench. Also the fact I have close to 75% of the values needed is a bonus as well. However, I have worked with an original pair of Neve 1073's with carbon comps for a few years and I'm lusting after that sound again. Is this really a moot point ultimately? My mind tells me that the metal oxide will sound clearer, but I don't know if that's a good thing in this case. Has anyone performed a critical listening test?
critterkllr said:RedRabbit said:3. I'm planning on using 1% metal film resistors primarily because that's what on my workbench. Also the fact I have close to 75% of the values needed is a bonus as well. However, I have worked with an original pair of Neve 1073's with carbon comps for a few years and I'm lusting after that sound again. Is this really a moot point ultimately? My mind tells me that the metal oxide will sound clearer, but I don't know if that's a good thing in this case. Has anyone performed a critical listening test?
FWIW, I couldn't find any comparisons on this. I'm building 3 EZ1290s. One with carbon comps, one with metal films and another with NOS components found in the originals (except electrolytics). When I'm done I will check back to see if anybody is interested in comparisons.
RedRabbit said:critterkllr said:RedRabbit said:3. I'm planning on using 1% metal film resistors primarily because that's what on my workbench. Also the fact I have close to 75% of the values needed is a bonus as well. However, I have worked with an original pair of Neve 1073's with carbon comps for a few years and I'm lusting after that sound again. Is this really a moot point ultimately? My mind tells me that the metal oxide will sound clearer, but I don't know if that's a good thing in this case. Has anyone performed a critical listening test?
FWIW, I couldn't find any comparisons on this. I'm building 3 EZ1290s. One with carbon comps, one with metal films and another with NOS components found in the originals (except electrolytics). When I'm done I will check back to see if anybody is interested in comparisons.
I'm definitely interested in hearing your results when you're finished! Thanks for experimenting with this. Too bad you didn't finish them already so I would know what to do!
critterkllr said:RedRabbit said:critterkllr said:RedRabbit said:3. I'm planning on using 1% metal film resistors primarily because that's what on my workbench. Also the fact I have close to 75% of the values needed is a bonus as well. However, I have worked with an original pair of Neve 1073's with carbon comps for a few years and I'm lusting after that sound again. Is this really a moot point ultimately? My mind tells me that the metal oxide will sound clearer, but I don't know if that's a good thing in this case. Has anyone performed a critical listening test?
FWIW, I couldn't find any comparisons on this. I'm building 3 EZ1290s. One with carbon comps, one with metal films and another with NOS components found in the originals (except electrolytics). When I'm done I will check back to see if anybody is interested in comparisons.
I'm definitely interested in hearing your results when you're finished! Thanks for experimenting with this. Too bad you didn't finish them already so I would know what to do!
I don't anticipate that it will make much of a difference outside of tolerance variation. Are you sure that your 1073 wasn't using Piher carbon film resisters? They look close to carbon comps.
Enter your email address to join: