Anyway, using a high step-up input xfmr also optimizes the contribution of the intrinsic valve noise. I don't see any believable justification for using a 1:2 or 1:4 xfmr vs. a 1:10. The only limit there is the HF response which suffers from the higher leakage inductance. The practical limit seems to be about 1:12, although there have been examples of 1:14.merlin said:OK, that makes sense. I am so used to thinking of regulated DC heaters -which leave you with the irreducible noise of the first valve- that it wouldn't occur to me to use more than 6dB of step-up. Not so for traditional AC-heater designs where you have hum to think about too.ruffrecords said:1:10 is very common in tube designs. It is the only way to achieve a reasonable noise figure.