bjosephs
Well-known member
Every so often I remember that I've been meaning to build a monitor controller and start googling around for ideas. I always come across this article on the Presonus Central Station with a very interesting little side bar on the BBC approach to monitor control. There are one or two threads here but they are looking for schematics or implementation guidance, which I am not (yet).
My question is about the need for a "Mono to A" switch.
The author points out that the lack of a "cut both" function is mitigated by "Mono to A" and "Cut A" simultaneously. They also mention the need for a "Mono to Both" to facilitate calibration of balance, but then also lament that mono through 2 speakers overly hypes center material, so use "Mono to A". If they included a "Mono to Both" switch and separate A and B cut switches, why have a separate "Mono to A" switch? Couldn't you can just do "Mono to Both" and "Cut B" simultaneously? Was there some added reason I'm not picking up on? At first I thought maybe implementation/wiring convenience but if this was just a functional spec they flowed to console builders it seems like the usefulness of the switch would be paramount. It seems so redundant in such a judicious layout that I can't shake the feeling that I'm missing something. Does anyone know?
My question is about the need for a "Mono to A" switch.
The author points out that the lack of a "cut both" function is mitigated by "Mono to A" and "Cut A" simultaneously. They also mention the need for a "Mono to Both" to facilitate calibration of balance, but then also lament that mono through 2 speakers overly hypes center material, so use "Mono to A". If they included a "Mono to Both" switch and separate A and B cut switches, why have a separate "Mono to A" switch? Couldn't you can just do "Mono to Both" and "Cut B" simultaneously? Was there some added reason I'm not picking up on? At first I thought maybe implementation/wiring convenience but if this was just a functional spec they flowed to console builders it seems like the usefulness of the switch would be paramount. It seems so redundant in such a judicious layout that I can't shake the feeling that I'm missing something. Does anyone know?