thesystem
Well-known member
well, that makes sense. I think I'm going to go for the post xformer way.
thanks
thanks
1sound said:Hey guys! I'm kind of in the early planning stages of this build and had a quick question.
Anyone try to build a compact 8 channel 1U (say 8" deep) version of this? Looked around but saw mostly 2U or 4 channel 1U's. It's for my new portable recording rig (the old one is kind of beer, whiskey and blood soaked compliments of a last minute bar recording gig / brawl event for a "friend") so space is at a real premium.
If not, can anyone think of any less than obvious problems they've had when putting these particular boards in close proxmity to each other? Any necessity of faraday shielding in between channels (there's just barely enough space in the enclosure unless my measurements are out to lunch). Parasitics?
Power is going to be externally shared with a universal console style switching supply.
Thanks in advance!
frazzman said:Not going to happen, you won't have enough space internally to house 8 of the boards, let alone the lack of rear panel real estate to house 16 xlr sockets. it would make more sense to build in 2ru and mount boards sideways
1sound said:Hey guys! I'm kind of in the early planning stages of this build and had a quick question.
Anyone try to build a compact 8 channel 1U (say 8" deep) version of this? Looked around but saw mostly 2U or 4 channel 1U's. It's for my new portable recording rig (the old one is kind of beer, whiskey and blood soaked compliments of a last minute bar recording gig / brawl event for a "friend") so space is at a real premium.
If not, can anyone think of any less than obvious problems they've had when putting these particular boards in close proxmity to each other? Any necessity of faraday shielding in between channels (there's just barely enough space in the enclosure unless my measurements are out to lunch). Parasitics?
Power is going to be externally shared with a universal console style switching supply.
Thanks in advance!
Just put the t-pad right after the output transformer. That's how all of my VPxx preamps are. It will work a treat.andia said:...I plan to do the attenuation with a t-pad attenuator after the output transformer. the t-pad has an impedance of 600ohms. the output transformer as it is wired no has an impedance of 300ohms, if I see it right. (ea2503)
my question is, do these have to be matched to have the same impedance or can I just put the attenuator after the transformer?
andia said:I plan to add an output attenuator to my access 312 pres
T-pad = http://hairballaudio.com/shop/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=65thesystem said:andia said:I plan to add an output attenuator to my access 312 pres
I'm planning on doing the same, what t-pad attenuator will you use and how do you wire it?
jsteiger said:T-pad = http://hairballaudio.com/shop/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=65thesystem said:andia said:I plan to add an output attenuator to my access 312 pres
I'm planning on doing the same, what t-pad attenuator will you use and how do you wire it?
If you get the PCB, the pads are labeled. It's super simple.
andia said:jsteiger said:T-pad = http://hairballaudio.com/shop/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=65thesystem said:andia said:I plan to add an output attenuator to my access 312 pres
I'm planning on doing the same, what t-pad attenuator will you use and how do you wire it?
If you get the PCB, the pads are labeled. It's super simple.
yes, I'm also going with jeffs t-pads...
Enter your email address to join: