Dubka said:
Could someone please explain why there is no option for an input transformer?
Cheers
thanks for the good call, so I can expose some my choises.
There are the following reasons:
My goal was to permit easily to use an 1U rack chassis for the PULTEQ EQ, because to save space in a recording studio is important today, so the sound engineers can have 4 or 6 or 8 pulteq eqs in a reasonable space.
Many out trasformers must be placed horizontally in a 1U rack chassis but is not so easy to do it. Considering that several opamps (IC and DOA's) doesn't work at +-24V to have an output level equal or better than 24dbu, an out trasformer (used in 1:2 config) is necessary to have this headroom.
So the chance to mount easily an out trasformer onboard was a "must" for me.
Yes, there are some DOA's that work at +-24V but I wanted that forum members could to use an +-16V DOA too, or, if needed, an IC opamp in place of it.
I have included an space onboard for the out trasformer only to mount it easily, not for other reasons.
An input trasformer can not be mounted vertically onboard inside an 1U rack chassis and it is very hard to mount onboard it horizontally (speaking for an 1U rack chassis), there are several input trasformers wired that can be mounted horizontally near to the input of the eq section with ties or screws, for example some Sowter xfrs can be mounted easily vertically on the 1U chassis's bottom panel using screws , some wired cinemag xfrs can be mounted horizontally inside a 1U rack chassis using plastic ties and connect it with its wires.
The second reason is the board's cost.
To include an output trasformer in the board was an added cost, but, since it was necessary for the above reason I decided to include it.
Regarding an input trasformer zone I decided to exclude it because it was not necessary as the output trasformer so I wanted to avoid a cost that for many customers maybe is only a cost, although actually it is important having it onboard when an input trasformer is needed , but we keep in mind that it's possible having it onboard not for 1U chassis and however an input trasformer can be placed outboard.
I would add that the out trasformer zone onboard is a cost added of 30% of theboard's total cost.
The 3th reason is that many commercial gears have only active unbalanced inputs for cost reductions. Input trasformers cost more and more than active unbalanced inputs, often the commercial gears have a simple section based on IC opamp or an dedicated IC in place of a trasformer. This section usually cost even 10 times less than a trasformer.
When I designed the board I considered even the option for the customer to have a cheap input section. A good option is an IC based input section and a DOA based out section with trasformer or trasformerless, perhaps even when the customer has just other 4 pulteq eq based on this board. The 3th reason seems to be similar to the 2nd, but it is not the same, because I wanted even to remake a thing that is become a "must" in the recording studio gears, that's the active input section. This is important to remake a "sound look" feature at the eq that's in many famous commercial gears' sound now.
However, the customer can mount an input trasformer outboard if he prefer it for having an old style sound.
I would like to add that my board is not in any case an cheap/low performances board, several solutions used are better than in expensive commercial gears, I permit myself to say without offence nobody. For example the input section uses a my new schematic without electrolityc caps.
cheers
Pier Paolo