Best affordable U47 Body?

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Matching of capsules would involve an anechoic chamber, a broad band noise source driving s speaker, then making sure both mike elements are in phase, , and magnitude, then reversing the phase on one and looking for complete signal cancellation.
 
Matching of capsules would involve an anechoic chamber, a broad band noise source driving s speaker, then making sure both mike elements are in phase, , and magnitude, then reversing the phase on one and looking for complete signal cancellation.
That's wildly overcomplicated and introduces tons of needless points of failure. This is probably the least efficient and most error-prone way to do this. You only need 2 sine wave sweeps with each capsule in the same exact location in a room with reasonable acoustics to match 2 capsules if you know they have the same anatomy. Since you're only matching capsules, you don't need any absolute reference, only the difference between the two.
 
Matching of capsules would involve an anechoic chamber, a broad band noise source driving s speaker, then making sure both mike elements are in phase, , and magnitude, then reversing the phase on one and looking for complete signal cancellation.
No company matches capsules this way. It would be too expensive and unecessary. Measuring output and freq. response is quite enough. Matched capsules are usually selected from large batches that have been individually measured beforehand. In any group of capsules there will always be some pairs that match perfectly.
My own capsule generally vary less than a half dB en masse.
 
Last edited:
That's wildly overcomplicated and introduces tons of needless points of failure. This is probably the least efficient and most error-prone way to do this. You only need 2 sine wave sweeps with each capsule in the same exact location in a room with reasonable acoustics to match 2 capsules if you know they have the same anatomy. Since you're only matching capsules, you don't need any absolute reference, only the difference between the two.
Hi Arienne, I was planning on using two of your flat K47s in these builds. Are you able to supply a matched pair if I order two at once? Thanks!

Best,
John
 
No company matches capsules this way. It would be too expensive and unecessary. Measuring output and freq. response is quite enough. Matched capsules are usually selected from large batches that have been individually measured beforehand. In any group of capsules there will always be some pairs that match perfectly.
My own capsule generally vary less than a half dB en masse.
"Matching" is matching, and should produce some numerical output describing how close the match is. What number is good enough? My method has been described elsewhere.
 
"Matching" is matching, and should produce some numerical output describing how close the match is. What number is good enough? My method has been described elsewhere.
I am not saying your method won't produce correct results. I am just saying that only a "one off" or private individual would got to that extent for a microphone used for music. Brüel og Kjær certainly used a similar method for testing random capsules or if required but measuring every pair of capsules out of 1000s of capsules that have already been measured individually would not be cost effective and the difference in results would be negligible if any.

The main difference you describe would be measuring 2 capsules at the same time and nulling them. When taking freq. responce graphs the signals are already laid in top of each other showing variations in freq. and output. The other steps are redundant.
 
Last edited:
I can't imagine what a production setup would look like that would produce uniform tension in membranes.
Is vacuum sputtering done post stretching?
Is the whole surface active in producing output, has any finite element analysis been done to optimise sputter masking? Mechanically inactive areas may not need to be metallised?
 
I can't imagine what a production setup would look like that would produce uniform tension in membranes.
Is vacuum sputtering done post stretching?
Is the whole surface active in producing output, has any finite element analysis been done to optimise sputter masking? Mechanically inactive areas may not need to be metallised?
 

Attachments

  • vlcsnap-00003.jpg
    vlcsnap-00003.jpg
    319.9 KB · Views: 1
  • 90.jpg
    90.jpg
    272.6 KB · Views: 0
Mechanically inactive areas may not need to be metallised?
Other points aside for a moment, I've never seen this done but I've been thinking about this exact thing for the past couple weeks. You don't need FEA as the math for how the membrane moves is fairly simple. I would love to try this. It would be as simple as calculating travel over the membrane for every location for every frequency and then making a final 2d map by averaging all the audible frequencies and sputtering that map.
 
Other points aside for a moment, I've never seen this done but I've been thinking about this exact thing for the past couple weeks. You don't need FEA as the math for how the membrane moves is fairly simple. I would love to try this. It would be as simple as calculating travel over the membrane for every location for every frequency and then making a final 2d map by averaging all the audible frequencies and sputtering that map.
I have done this quite a long time ago but it doesn't present itself that linearly. There are so many other factors working simultaneously in a capsule and some aspects of freq. can be attained in more than one way.

The membrane moves like a drop in water not like a piston. I have a plot of this somewhere from an AKG white paper
 
Last edited:
I have done this quite a long time ago but it doesn't present itself that linearly. There are so many other factors working simultaneously in a capsule and some aspects of freq. can be attained in more than one way.

The membrane moves like a drop in water not like a piston. I have a plot of this somewhere from an AKG white paper
I know how the membrane moves. It's pretty interesting!
 
Back
Top