it was one sci-fi futuristic plot line question... not serious.That's not the question, John.
I try not to take this too seriously while I see a problem from the dumbing down of education (trying to force equal outcomes by squashing down merit based advancement) and the advancing capability of machines. This won't end well for the slackers of the world.
AI programmer's goals?As lying showed, the AI had it's own goal. What if the armed robots conclude that they would be much better off without humans?
indeed there needs to be fail safes engineered in, while I can imagine mad scientists skipping that step...The essential difference between a program and AI is that the AI uses self modifying code. Kind of hard to predict where that will end up. We can't even debug "stupid" code easily once it reaches a certain complexity. How would we be able to debug self-modifying code?
Trust but verify... there have been many old crimes solved by the public pursuit of family trees.Compare to image recognition software. If you just use it for text recognition, there isn't much to go wrong, is there? Yet, Xerox copiers can change numbers, if you set the quality to a lower level and save as a pdf. Not a real biggie, but if you start convicting (or even arresting) people based on image recognition software, I think you have a real, albeit rare, problem. The same has been seen with DNA as evidence. The first two non-related individuals with matching DNA have been found. One of them spent many years in jail, while being innocent.
You can have my DNA after I'm dead.
JR