ruckus328
Well-known member
OK, keep thinking about it and trying to wrap my head around this, figured this would be a good place to discuss. Is it possible? This is what I've been brainstorming:
OK, so going to need a pot (maybe a dual pot), and probably want to buffer the signals.
In the one extreme - L & R signals would each be going to their respective sidechains.....
In the other extreme - L & R signals would be summed and go to a single sidechain. Ahh.... now it's getting confusing (for me anyways). I can't think of anyway to achieve this. Only thing I can think is to sum the signals and send the summed signal to both sidechains, which I think would give me the same results. With res/cap tolerances, one of the sidechains would always (slightly) dominate the other anyways, since both sidechains would be seeing the identical summed signal, in sense it would still be operating in gssl mode.
Enter roadblock. I keep going through the "well what if I.............nope", "well maybe if I............ehh nope", "well if they both...........damnit.......nope" Maybe this is simpler than I'm making it out to be.....or maybe not.
Ideas & input are welcomed & appreciated.
OK, so going to need a pot (maybe a dual pot), and probably want to buffer the signals.
In the one extreme - L & R signals would each be going to their respective sidechains.....
In the other extreme - L & R signals would be summed and go to a single sidechain. Ahh.... now it's getting confusing (for me anyways). I can't think of anyway to achieve this. Only thing I can think is to sum the signals and send the summed signal to both sidechains, which I think would give me the same results. With res/cap tolerances, one of the sidechains would always (slightly) dominate the other anyways, since both sidechains would be seeing the identical summed signal, in sense it would still be operating in gssl mode.
Enter roadblock. I keep going through the "well what if I.............nope", "well maybe if I............ehh nope", "well if they both...........damnit.......nope" Maybe this is simpler than I'm making it out to be.....or maybe not.
Ideas & input are welcomed & appreciated.