Compact desktop line mixer?

[Newmarket]

NE5532/34?

Yeah - not sure you got my SoH there tbh

There is more to than just EMI.

So called "Faster" Op-Amp's will have a higher frequency corner where distortion rises. Many quite fast ones are flat to ~ 10kHz and some to 20kHz and even 100kHz.

This means high frequency intermodulation especially is reduced.

Yes - I could have referenced RF rather than RFI (tough crowd ). But my basic point was to not have the opamp / active circuitry "see" any unnecessary signal frequency.

That's a 10MHz Op-Amp, 13V/uS slew rate. Fastish. And it's not a simple integrator compensated Op-Amp.

Yes. My basic point was that as a teenager with little money - spending that amount on a single opamp was not tenable.
The "hobbyist" shop was somewhat comedic. It would typically be shut for lunch and a queue of very serious hobbyists would form. Woe betide you if you didn't know exactly what you required when you got to the front of the queue. Said items - resistors / capacitors / transistors etc. - would be retrieved from various boxes / drawers / tobacco tins etc. by a grumpy man with a big unkempt beard

That's still a MHz Op-Amp (3MHz) and it's also 13V/uS Slew rate. So the output can change as fast as that of the 553X.

Yes. For clarity - not suggesting GBW is a problem here.

Distortion is high, but for a Bass FX that's a good thing.

Well if you drive them hard enough. Interestingly the Sansamp Bass Driver/DI uses some CMOS opamps (at least according to any documentation I have seen) while the Behringer BDI21 "clone" appears to use TLxxx or similar IIRC.

It's bloody noisy though, noisier than a bunch of teen chav girls at their pregnant friends Hen do after the third round of shots.

Thor

Question of voltage noise Vs current noise. Latter becomes important wrt Hi-Z sources eg typical passive bass.
But yes we can do better now than TL07x or related LF351.
I'll leave the social observations to yourself

 

[thor.zmt]

Yes - I could have referenced RF rather than RFI (tough crowd ). But my basic point was to not have the opamp / active circuitry "see" any unnecessary signal frequency.

Given we now define as at least 40kHz bandwidth (my phone does that on a Bluetooth link), 40kHz is signal.

The "hobbyist" shop was somewhat comedic. It would typically be shut for lunch and a queue of very serious hobbyists would form. Woe betide you if you didn't know exactly what you required when you got to the front of the queue. Said items - resistors / capacitors / transistors etc. - would be retrieved from various boxes / drawers / tobacco tins etc. by a grumpy man with a big unkempt beard

Cricklewood Electronic, by the sound of it. Near the pink rupee, best kashmiri curry in London.

Well if you drive them hard enough. Interestingly the Sansamp Bass Driver/DI uses some CMOS opamps (at least according to any documentation I have seen) while the Behringer BDI21 "clone" appears to use TLxxx or similar IIRC.

I upgraded the Behringer clown with CMOS Op-Amp's and few extra mods. It's very good that way. I made some "utility cabinets" with a nice "hifi-ish" 12" Bicone driver and a 100W plate amp (full range) that jacked into various of the modded Behringer DI + boxes for musicians to hear themselves.

Question of voltage noise Vs current noise.

Trivial yo give the 5534 a 1.5nV|/Hz J-Fet frontend. Or add a J113 buffer before a 553X. Or go discrete. Tubes works actually pretty well there. In those days old tube TV's from scrap would have cost nothing.

No need to make excuses.

Thor