Deaths from climate change

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I get specs for energy systems on my desk yearly or so. Usually, the tech design is very solid.

After me, the project developers get their say. Then it's transferred to the gov people. By the time the project gets executed, it's hard to recognise it, especially from a tech point.

The last project manager I worked with, got robbed last week. His 350.000€ watch got stolen. It was a gift from one of the suppliers...

The stupid SOB had the watch put into the police report. That means I'll probably never have to deal with him again. Some days are better than others.
 
On Trump's inauguration day of Jan 20th, 2016, avg. pump price was $1.965, and when he left office in 2020 it was $2.665, an increase of 35%. Ergo, it was the market reacting to his terrible policies? It also broadly increased under Bush, and Obama as well.
I'll take 35% over 4 years (and during that period it fluctuated between $1.8x and $2.9x) over 70%+ in 14 months. Under Biden it's done nothing but increase from $2.4x to now $4.32. Give it another 33 months and see where we are.

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=emm_epm0_pte_nus_dpg&f=m
How exactly does the US president control the price of an internationally traded commodity, which generates about 100 million barrels daily, of which the US utilizes roughly 15-20%? In fact, oil today (inflation adjusted) is still significantly cheaper today than it was broadly during the last Bush presidency between 2007 and 2009.
By pushing bad policies that negatively impact production and distribution of oil and gas. It really isn't that hard to understand. And inflation adjusted pricing doesn't help John and Jane Q. American pay their bills when their pay isn't keeping up with rampant government induced inflation. But Joe's a man of the people, right? Riiiight.
 
Last edited:
I often scratch my head about Americans who seem to imagine themselves living on an island with an omnipotent government.

In reality, gas prices originate on a global market, and macro factors that determine worldwide supply and demand as well as commodity speculators in Switzerland (and elsewhere) have a lot more influence on domestic gas prices than any Washington government possibly could have.

Another fact well-known among scientists but rarely understood by the public is that longer-term demand follows supply: with more oil in the market gas gets cheaper, manufacturing starts to use more energy and people buy bigger cars. It's the same with urban planning: The bigger roads you build, the more car traffic there is. People and businesses react to the environment around them.

Psychologically people (everywhere, of course) like to maintain their illusion of control and fiercely fight back against these facts and their implications. But they are nonetheless facts.
 
I often scratch my head about Americans who seem to imagine themselves living on an island with an omnipotent government.
and Europeans who......... nah, just read my mind. ;)
In reality, gas prices originate on a global market, and macro factors that determine worldwide supply and demand as well as commodity speculators in Switzerland (and elsewhere) have a lot more influence on domestic gas prices than any Washington government possibly could have.
International oil prices are controlled by a cartel OPEC+. The + signifies Russia who depends on energy exports so cooperates with the cartel.
Another fact well-known among scientists but rarely understood by the public is that longer-term demand follows supply: with more oil in the market gas gets cheaper,
Supply/demand relationships are within the purview of economists who are not literally hard scientists but social sciences and math is involved. :unsure: I joke that economics is a soft science because human behavior is involved.
manufacturing starts to use more energy
Energy use by manufacturing is both a necessity and a significant cost to be managed. Industries that require lots of energy will gravitate toward inexpensive energy regions. Germany has multiple different energy prices (taxes and levies) giving large manufacturers lower wholesale priced electricity while consumers and small businesses pay higher rates.
and people buy bigger cars.
People don't buy bigger vehicles because fuel is cheap, they apparently "want" to drive bigger vehicles for sundry reasons (like perceived safety). Lower priced fuel supports that desire to drive larger vehicles. When I was younger I drove a motorcycle... now that was fuel efficient. :cool:
It's the same with urban planning: The bigger roads you build, the more car traffic there is. People and businesses react to the environment around them.
Not always but if planning is appropriate for actual demand. China built some massive mega cities that sat empty for years. Authoritarian governments prefer densely populated cities as easier to manage the populace.
Psychologically people (everywhere, of course) like to maintain their illusion of control and fiercely fight back against these facts and their implications. But they are nonetheless facts.
Sounds like a theory to me... My theory is that unfettered cheap energy supply will promote economic growth making the world wealthier while reducing poverty. More US oil/gas production would lower world oil prices (the US is not a member of OPEC) and lower world oil prices would literally deny money from Putin's war budget.

Sadly right now Russia, the + in OPEC+ is receiving billions from energy sales keeping his war machine going. I like the suggestion to put payments for Russian energy into escrow to be released to the Russian people only after Putin withdraws and stops destroying Ukraine. The EU has paid $38B to Russia since the Ukraine war started. Russia's 2022 energy revenue forecast is $320B.

Of course "opinions" vary.

JR
 
Sounds like a theory to me... My theory is that unfettered cheap energy supply will promote economic growth making the world wealthier while reducing poverty. More US oil/gas production would lower world oil prices (the US is not a member of OPEC) and lower world oil prices
Odds are US production will increase naturally while prices are high. Extraction of oil in the US is generally more expensive than in Saudi Arabia or the UAE, eg, so it makes zero sense for an oil company to extract in the US if prices are low. So there's likely a point where lower prices would make US extraction uneconomical (it's happened before.) Of course, increasing US production is not an overnight solution either. It takes time. Thawing relations with Venezuela (as Biden is trying to do) would probably be at least as effective as increasing US production, and could likely do more faster.
 
an old oil industry saying is that the cure for high oil prices is high oil prices... BUT the economic climate has changed for the oil industry. ESG investing (Environmental, Social, and Governance) has made major oil company stocks unpopular (I sold my BP stock a year ago or more). The oil majors are now investing major capital into ESG friendly projects to win back favor instead of expanding new drilling. IIRC a recent fed candidate suggested withholding access to lending from oil drillers to starve them and prevent more supply from coming to market.

Coincidentally at congressional hearings yesterday legislators asked oil companies why they weren't producing more oil. :rolleyes:

US rig counts usually a predictor for oil output are up recently but it's somewhat different this time. They are mostly working to replace oil supply as older wells lose production output. As covid fades and demand recovers we need more supply to keep up.

===

Venezuela or Iran might be a viable sources of cheap oil, if they weren't authoritarian anti-democratic governments and bad actors in their respective regions. Canada OTOH is a friendly (?) democratic neighbor and prepared to supply us with 830,000 barrels of oil a day through the XL Keystone pipeline. President Biden cancelled the permits his first day in office. The Biden administration is now posturing to increase imports from Canada :rolleyes:..(seems a little like one of those schizophrenic characters from a batman comic).

JR
 
Under Biden it's done nothing but increase from $2.4x to now $4.32.
Between Jan of 2020 to mid 2021, prices were below the moving average of Trump's last term in office. The minimum price was May of 2020 ($1.80). Prices didn't rise back to Jan of 2020 levels until Feb of 2021. Coincidentally they track the price of crude oil almost exactly.

So just to make sure I understand the argument, prices were always rising under Biden (except when they weren't), but the disastrous policies that he put into place when he took office didn't actually effect prices until a little over one year later (coincidentally exactly when COVID restrictions were starting to lift world-wide)?

Allow me to offer an alternate explanation (that happens to match the data): gas prices are set by the global price of crude, and driven by the regular supply-demand curve, just like every other internationally traded commodity. Modulo starting a war with an oil producing country, who is sitting in the White House is far less important.

If you overlay the gas price chart cited above over the global supply demand curve, they happen to line up exactly:

Knoema_Data_Driven_World_Crude_Oil_Supply_and_Demand_Forecast_Updated.png


Demand fell sharply in late 2019 (I wonder what that was? Maybe Biden's first executive order that everyone needed to be sneezed on by someone who is COVID positive?), and crude oil prices cratered in the following months as world-wide demand dried up. Ever since, demand has recovered quicker than supply, putting upwards pressure on prices (because of course it does, just like any other global commodity in supply/demand imbalance). Notice that global supply still hasn't recovered to the levels pre-pandemic by nearly 10 million barrels per day.

We can flip the argument backwards and see if the logic still holds up: Biden's disastrous policies are responsible for the price of gas, but Trump's weren't. So during Trump's term, the oil industry was in an orgy of expanded drilling, and energy companies were free to unleash their product on the market to contain prices, and make sure that supply and demand were in balance. Finally the free market was unburdened to solve all of our problems.

They why did gas prices rise broadly between 2016 and 2020? Why didn't the energy industry do as John suggests, and increase supply to meet demand since they were finally free to do so?

But oil companies are making profits at an all time rate (which is simultaneously impossible because Biden's policies are crushing these companies), so where are all those profits going if not to increasing supply?

"Investors in energy stocks have been a bit thrown off by the volatility, so they're looking more for energy firms to pay back down their debt, or return money to shareholders, rather than going and investing in new wells — even if those new wells would be profitable," Ashworth said.

In other words, many companies are choosing to enjoy their high profits rather than increase the supply of oil. That's despite the relatively low oil price they would need to turn a profit. On a different Dallas Fed question, executives said oil prices between $23 and $38 a barrel, on average, would cover the cost of drilling new wells.

"Investors have demanded restraint and capital discipline of their client companies," one survey taker told the Dallas Fed.

Another said: "Discipline continues to dominate the industry. Shareholders and lenders continue to demand a return on capital, and until it becomes unavoidably obvious that high energy prices will sustain, there will be no exploration spending."

In completely unrelated news:

Energy companies are facing the prospects of a long-term decline in demand for oil and gas, concerns about climate change, and the push to renewable energy. In response, they’re taking their profits and rather than using that money to drill new wells are sending cash back to investors. As a result, the energy sector’s dividends are growing faster than any other part of the U.S. equity market. Since 2018, the average dollar amount of dividends among energy companies has grown by over 50%. That’s up from just 5% growth for the prior three years. And since 2016, energy companies’ dividend amounts are up 80% for the five-year period.

Thanks Biden!
 
politics and economics mix as well as oil and water...

Yes world energy prices are driven by supply and demand. The major factor affecting demand over the last few years was COVID (duh) reducing demand. Supply is controlled in part by OPEC+. President Biden's crack down on domestic supply was mostly superfluous until world wide demand recovered enough to make it matter. Now the lack of our marginal supply and low prospects for future domestic supply increases affects future expectations.

Of course Ukraine is a factor, while Putin is enjoying dividends in increased revenue from higher world oil prices.

I'll let others speculate about good or bad intentions.

JR
 
Between Jan of 2020 to mid 2021, prices were below the moving average of Trump's last term in office. The minimum price was May of 2020 ($1.80). Prices didn't rise back to Jan of 2020 levels until Feb of 2021. Coincidentally they track the price of crude oil almost exactly.
Biden was inaugurated January 2021. 2/3 of the time period you reference, 1/20-5/21 was under Trump. I think you need to review your timeline.

So just to make sure I understand the argument, prices were always rising under Biden (except when they weren't), but the disastrous policies that he put into place when he took office didn't actually effect prices until a little over one year later (coincidentally exactly when COVID restrictions were starting to lift world-wide)?
Prices fluctuated under Trump due to market forces, not stupid energy policy choices. I would also point out that the US economy was booming 2017 into March 2020 when the Covid over-reactions began. Price increases when unemployment is low and wages are rising (and inflation is low) are tolerable. Now compare to the period Jan 2021 to Feb 2021.

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=emm_epm0_pte_nus_dpg&f=m
Allow me to offer an alternate explanation (that happens to match the data): gas prices are set by the global price of crude, and driven by the regular supply-demand curve, just like every other internationally traded commodity. Modulo starting a war with an oil producing country, who is sitting in the White House is far less important.
And supply was needlessly reduced by Biden policy while inflation has raged (also due to bad gov policy).

If you overlay the gas price chart cited above over the global supply demand curve, they happen to line up exactly:

Knoema_Data_Driven_World_Crude_Oil_Supply_and_Demand_Forecast_Updated.png


Demand fell sharply in late 2019 (I wonder what that was? Maybe Biden's first executive order that everyone needed to be sneezed on by someone who is COVID positive?), and crude oil prices cratered in the following months as world-wide demand dried up. Ever since, demand has recovered quicker than supply, putting upwards pressure on prices (because of course it does, just like any other global commodity in supply/demand imbalance). Notice that global supply still hasn't recovered to the levels pre-pandemic by nearly 10 million barrels per day.
You're misreading the graph. There's a data point each quarter. The drop in demand was in early 2020 as the pandemic hit and shut downs began.

We can flip the argument backwards and see if the logic still holds up: Biden's disastrous policies are responsible for the price of gas, but Trump's weren't.
Your analysis is flawed. Are you denying that inflation is way up as are US pump prices?
 
I read an interesting article in WSJ today about utilities considering putting compact modular nuclear power reactors in place of existing coal plants. They could seamlessly push clean electricity into the existing grid and reduce carbon to near zero. The modular design should be cheaper to build.

Still have to deal with the public's ignorance about nuclear energy, NIMBY, etc.

JR
 

Earth Day Fun Fact: Co-Founder Murdered His Girlfriend, Stuffed Her in a Trunk, and Composted Her Body. Recycling​

 
Last edited:
For a thought almost on topic (death from climate change), I heard Dr Drew Pinsky (an addiction specialist) on TV and he suggested that, not the changing climate but all the hyperbolic claims that the world is ending in X years because of climate change is have a negative impact on adolescent mental health.

JR
 

Latest posts

Back
Top