rock soderstrom
Tour de France
I think your voltage divider resistor will get quite warm for a short time at the moment of switching on, when the tube is cold....if you don't take any measures against it.
Leave that out for now. It needs extremely clean heater power or it's noisy.What's the best solution ? a divider with 7,5v + 6,8Ω or a cathode R 240Ω ?
If divider is this schem. correct ?
Just an another example, this is how Neumann did it in the U67. Kathode is grounded, heater voltage negative.
View attachment 130044
I think your voltage divider resistor will get quite warm for a short time at the moment of switching on, when the tube is cold....if you don't take any measures against it.
Another solution is to use 2 diodes (1N4148) in serie to get 2x0,6v... ?Leave that out for now. It needs extremely clean heater power or it's noisy.
If you keep your way of labeling consistent, then it would be:Pin 5 = to anode (90v@3,5mA)
Pin 6 = connect to anode > output
You forgot one thing in your list Ulli: sound!Heat, noise and distortion
Yes Thorsten,You forgot one thing in your list Ulli: sound!
This is of course highly subjective, but I have often made direct comparisons. Tube microphones come much closer to my idea of sound than any other technology. Whether that justifies all the extra effort is something everyone has to decide for themselves.
From a purely technical point of view I can understand you, but I don't build measurement microphones, I build microphones that make their recordings (at best) larger than life. I'm not interested in reality, I don't record movie sound or classical music. I see microphones as part of the design of the recording, technical values don't really interest me that much, as long as you can make professional recordings with them.
Somehow your post reminds me of a post by a dog lover in a cat thread.
And tubes are fun ! and easy to build & biasYou forgot one thing in your list Ulli: sound!
This is of course highly subjective, but I have often made direct comparisons. Tube microphones come much closer to my idea of sound than any other technology. Whether that justifies all the extra effort is something everyone has to decide for themselves.
From a purely technical point of view I can understand you, but I don't build measurement microphones, I build microphones that make their recordings (at best) larger than life. I'm not interested in reality, I don't record movie sound or classical music. I see microphones as part of the design of the recording, technical values don't really interest me that much, as long as you can make professional recordings with them.
Somehow your post reminds me of a post by a dog lover in a cat thread.
What is a “hoops”?I installed "hoops" to properly maintain the tube support circuit.
Enter your email address to join: