Matador
Well-known member
Not sure if it helps: I know a guy with a deluxe reverb that has brought it in to me to repair twice now with destroyed reverb tank springs. He travels with the amp often and isn't 'kind' with it, to the point where the springs are bashed into the floating aluminum frame repeatedly until the magnets pull from the transducers and then he calls me.I can only repeat myself, thank you very much for the numerous ideas and information! There is a lot of exciting stuff in here.
My experiments so far have shown that electronic control (signal processing) of the decay is effective but also changes the original sound. I see that as an useful add-on.
As a basis, I will rather favour corresponding tanks with different decay lengths, possibly also mechanically modified.
The topic of the position of the springs is also interesting and deserves its own thread.
My current test setup switches the individual tanks, which works well, but my next design will make the individual tanks variable mixable. That brings a lot of advantages.
In the last MOD tank I used, they fit two foam pads to protect the springs during shipping: one "underneath" (between the spring and the floating channel), and another above to clamp the springs into place. I found if you remove only the top pad, the bottom pad is fit so it just brushes the springs from underneath but doesn't really prevent them from vibrating much.
We found he is much happier with the bottom foam left in place, because it allows him to use above 3 on the reverb control, and the decay time is reduced and the reverb is more lush and not so "over-washed" in echos. Plus, if the amp takes a blow, the springs hit the foam pad and cannot contact the bottom aluminum channel any longer.
I know this doesn't directly address your question (I think you want to be able to control this from a front panel), but it's something I hadn't considered before and it ended up being an elegant solution.