[quote author="Rob Flinn"]
Say with Lorlins in G-SSL/G-Pultec-style,
Yes, but to do this as the original you need 6 switches that have more than 12 positions[/quote]
Oops right, I saw both those thresholds-switches needed more. Thanks for pointing out.
The rest seems fine for Lorlins though, and maybe with a mildly cut corner or two added SPDT-switches, nahh, ... so OK, so
all Lorlin except for the two thresholds which are then off-PCB and need to be a more tasty switch.
Maybe one day... :wink:
Happy finishing. :thumb:
And thanks Kev for the added info, better understand it now.
[quote author="Kev"]A different approach could be to take the basic detection and gain reduction method and apply one of the DOAs and trafo arrangements found about the Lab
and use them as I/O
perhaps the front end could be as simple as a trafo and pad[/quote]
I was triggered by the Hi-Z stages after the diode-bridge, me likes this topology :wink:
So the (as often asked before already by others) question arose again whether the fun of this circuit was in the diode-bridge or the specific TXs etc. The audio-patch could indeed be very short. And I'm wondering, for getting just a taste of diode-compression we might not even need the limting stage for now. (Don't know about the typical use of this box, maybe people use both functions together all the time).
Note I don't want to simplify/cheapify this circuit beyond recognition, it's just that I'm trying to form an idea about whether this circuit in it's simplest form would give me a nice idea about diode-compression or that I better look elsewhere for a first taste of this kind of gain-control. (Once I like it I could start making the whole thing from scratch or adding to the simple version).
apply one of the DOAs and trafo arrangements found about the Lab
and use them as I/O
You mean 'going non-stock' starting from the output of the diff Hi-Z buffer ? Sounds interesting.
Regards,
Peter