They were arguing that the "fact" (their own inflation number) should be discounted because it doesn't reflect recent sagging energy prices. They are arguing for a hypothetical lower next inflation number. Expert opinions vary about that (no I am not the expert, but above average).
Less travel perhaps for future home buyers, not sure how much that will help. Homebuilders have been challenged with materials cost increases, lack of labor, etc. Rising interest rates will price many marginal buyers out of the market. Some might just decide to take a vacation, but the airlines are having trouble keeping up too.
Huh? This has been very publicly discussed. The low unemployment rate means that the fed off the hook wrt that, while we still suffer from low workforce participation rates. The FED are telegraphing another 75 basis point increase (3/4%) later this month.
The target inflation rate is 2% while the recent reported number is 9%. The central bankers have been trying to talk down rising inflation expectations. The test will be to see how the fed acts after they see the stock market react to the next rate increase (and the 2nd quarter GDP number will be final making the recession we are already in official. )
or not...
JR