scott2000
Well-known member
If they had....and they were Xvive?Anyone found a way around the EU ban on vactrols?
/Jakob E.
If they had....and they were Xvive?Anyone found a way around the EU ban on vactrols?
/Jakob E.
Nowadays titanium dioxide is the go-to chem for everything from sun block to the powder on donuts and anything the marketing folks think has to be pure white.I am well aware that zinc oxide was used as sun block back in the day.
It is not clear to me that being toxic per se is enough for CdS to be banned. For sure there are millions of toxic substances in ue in everyday life but they are not all banned. I know Cadmium itself is banned in the EU but is CdS specifically mentioned? How toxic is it comparaed to, say, bleach?Oh no, CdS is toxic. But it's not offensively toxic when used in small quantities. A CdS cell has only a tiny amount of CdS in it. So it's not bad like lead solder which is very toxic in a bioacummulation way and accounted for significant mass of a circuit board when it was used.
Note that chemical analogies do not work as expected. If you look at a periodic table, Sulfur is in the same column and directly under Oxygen and Cadmium is in the same column and directly under Zinc but Zinc Oxide has very low toxicity (it's used in lots of house hold products and even as a food additive) but CdS is definitely toxic. You would not want to make a hand cream out of it or sprinkle it on tacos.
IIRC you have the idea of not selling the opto part ? a daughter opto board, rent or lend, with a sticker on it like -this is the property of...-So, for now, there's no solution that I'm aware of
No idea but if they have banned an entire element, that would include all molecules containing that element.I know Cadmium itself is banned in the EU but is CdS specifically mentioned?
Again your chemical comparisons are not ideal. Bleach is not toxic. It's a strong base that will dissolve organics but it doesn't give you cancer.How toxic is it comparaed to, say, bleach?
I love this place...Again your chemical comparisons are not ideal. Bleach is not toxic. It's a strong base that will dissolve organics but it doesn't give you cancer.
WWW said:Gargling or drinking bleach most likely would cause superficial burns in the esophagus. The CDC notes that adults attempting suicide by ingesting liquid bleach have shown that "a lethal dose" of sodium hypochlorite can vary from 7 to 18 ounces at concentrations of 3 percent to 12 percent. 3. Don't bathe in bleach
Yes, they are the same basic technology.Power transistors were full of beryllium supposedly, and no-one banned those....
These 'vactrols'- are they the ones Neve used in their Necam faders and 618 opto boards when they ran out of
CLM6500's? I've got some somewhere...
Zep is pretty awesome. EaCo Chem Britenol HD is a big step above but it's pretty potent. Actually pretty safe, safer than their One Restore which will etch the glaze from tile, but cuidado still.I have had some success using Glycolic acid (ZEP) and lots of elbow grease (lots of scrubbing). Despite removing lots of rust colored water stains, I can now see more to clean.
As I said earlier, you shouldn't worry about that, because it's the R vs I curve that is important.I just bought a bunch of LEDs. This evening I tested 20 nominally identical RED LEDs with my Peak ATLAS tester which feeds a precise 5mA though them. The forward voltage drop ranged from 1.88V to 1.92V which is a range of just 0.04 volts. This compares to the 0.2 volt range I saw when testing five Vactrols. I remain suspicious of the Vactrols.
it's the R vs I curve that is important
No, but what concerns me is that some Vactrols are clustered very close to 1.7V and others very close to 1.9V with nothing in between. It makes me suspicious that the LEDs may not be the same. From the opto resistor measurements I have made at 5mA the resistances are not that far apart so it may not be an issue but I am just suspicious by nature.As I said earlier, you shouldn't worry about that, because it's the R vs I curve that is important.
The actual tolerance on the LDR is way larger.
You don't intend to use voltage-drive for the LED, do you?
It just means they use different formulations.No, but what concerns me is that some Vactrols are clustered very close to 1.7V and others very close to 1.9V with nothing in between.
I think they are indeed different. As long as the performance template is satisfied, is it a problem?It makes me suspicious that the LEDs may not be the same.
That's all that countsFrom the opto resistor measurements I have made at 5mA the resistances are not that far apart so it may not be an issue
It may take a toll on the number of years you have to live... Relax.but I am just suspicious by nature.
Agree 100%. I was initially making measurements of opto resistance at a fixed current and out of curiosity decided to check LED forward voltage as well. I was hoping someone with much better semiconductor knowledge than I have could tell me if the observed spread was typical or not. The vendor has contacted Xvive on my behalf so hopefully they will have a definitive answer soon.Optocells are intended for mono- only unit(s)? For linked stereo unit ? Or intended for dual mono unit ?
Only in the latter case matching might be called for, and likely so if individual cells are too way-off But might try small value trimmers before LEDs. "What comp" used that, which later also inspired cell- matching of DAOC. Won't be perfect but good enough in many/most cases.
I beg to differ. If you want any kind of repeatability, like maximum GR ot just having the correct markings on the front panel, you need to select optoresistive couplers, just like FET's in 1176's.Optocells are intended for mono- only unit(s)? For linked stereo unit ? Or intended for dual mono unit ?
Only in the latter case matching might be called for, and likely so if individual cells are too way-off