Line level splitter?

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

JW

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
1,110
Location
Portland USA
I've been thinking about a box that splits the line level output of microphone preamps and/or other rack gear (compressors etc) on the way to the recorder (AD inputs) This would be a workaround in order to monitor with no latency with an external mixer, while I have the direct signal go straight to the converters.

Something like 8 in/16 out would be great. It's essential to keep the direct signal clean and un affected. Is the best way to do this to hang an opamp circuit in parallel off of the preamps outputs? (almost all of them are transformer outputs)

I'm not that concerned with perfect sound quality of the 'monitoring leg' as I am with maintaining the direct sound to the recorder.

???
 
Sorry to hijack an almost 2 year old thread. I don't want to start a new one, because I have a similar need as the original poster (or should I say, the client who is paying me to build the active 1:6 balanced line splitter unit)

Anyway, I'm thinking of 12 opamp buffers, arranged like in this schematic (shown for 2 channels)

Only problem is, I'm not sure if I have to add an output capacitor, or an output resistor, or both, for each opamp. Hoping that the resident experts can help clarify.
 

Attachments

  • balanced line buffer.jpg
    balanced line buffer.jpg
    128.1 KB
Sorry to hijack an almost 2 year old thread. I don't want to start a new one, because I have a similar need as the original poster (or should I say, the client who is paying me to build the active 1:6 balanced line splitter unit)

Anyway, I'm thinking of 12 opamp buffers, arranged like in this schematic (shown for 2 channels)

Only problem is, I'm not sure if I have to add an output capacitor, or an output resistor, or both, for each opamp. Hoping that the resident experts can help clarify.

Assuming your source is low impedance eg a preamp output, then you can likely just split the output without an additional opamp buffer. Unless driving a low impedance input like 600 Ohm.
With the circuit shown you would normally have a build out series resistor to avoid problems with cable capacitance. Capacitor optional but the safe bet as you don't generally know the details of the destination although most kit will ac couple at the input.
Apart from DC offset considerations a suitably rated capacitor helps with any P48 danger.
 
Totally understood that it's an overkill to have multiple opamp buffers, but it's what the guy wants.

I tested the circuit as it is, sounded pretty good, but my cable was very short. So just to play it safe, I will add a 100 ohm output resistor and 100uF/35V output cap, including another 47K resistor to ground after the cap.

Thanks for the clarification!
 
Use 50 Ohms and a 470µF output capacitor. It´s lowers the THD at the lower frequencies significantly.
Best regards!
Unfortunately, I ran out of 470uF electrolytic caps. I used my last batch of Chemicon KZE in a few dozens of Meanwell SMPS repair for a local lighting company, and I'd rather not spend a dime to buy more but instead use/exhaust what I already have. Those components including tiny SMD parts are taking up too much space :)
 
Unfortunately, I ran out of 470uF electrolytic caps. I used my last batch of Chemicon KZE in a few dozens of Meanwell SMPS repair for a local lighting company, and I'd rather not spend a dime to buy more but instead use/exhaust what I already have. Those components including tiny SMD parts are taking up too much space :)
you decide what you do
best regards
 
Unfortunately, I ran out of 470uF electrolytic caps. I used my last batch of Chemicon KZE in a few dozens of Meanwell SMPS repair for a local lighting company, and I'd rather not spend a dime to buy more but instead use/exhaust what I already have. Those components including tiny SMD parts are taking up too much space :)
[I'd rather not spend a dime to buy more but instead use/exhaust what I already have] -- You would be doing your client a great disservice by being so cheap as to not buy a few capacitors and do the job correctly, instead of merely using what happens to be laying around your workspace!!! In addition, as -- jokeramik -- had pointed out, his suggested capacitor and resistor values would offer greatly improved audio performance!!! >> DON'T BE A CHEESEBALL!!! << >> DO THE RIGHT THING!!! <<

NOTE:
-- Use at least 63V electrolytic capacitors!!!

https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/aluminum-electrolytic-capacitors/58?s=N4IgjCBcoKwExVAYygMwIYBsDOBTANCAPZQDaIAzABxVwDsMIAuoQA4AuUIAyuwE4BLAHYBzEAF9CANgCciECkgYcBYmRAAWMGCoy6zNp0g9+wsZM0AGRtAVoseQiUjkKMSxqoUDIDl16CohKE7lTyisqOai7gFHRaIIRgdHTJPn7GAWbB4DK64fYqTuqWzBZwHnK2EQ6qzuQadJYABACtAGLpRiAAqkIC7ADyqACyuOjYAK58uDkVdFXIhVH1IFIUzQBqXVx9A8NjE9OzFgC0CNVQ-JN16oxMZ1IFkNe3Md6ECA8WNqCsUGA2P9IHAYOJxEA

And, just for grins and is distantly related to what it is that you are doing.....here is a rack-panel I had designed for a "12-Channel Microphone Splitter" system for a Canadian audio company:

1727935599810.png

/
 
The build out series resistor value is not critical. 50 Ohm is not particularly convenient to obtain. More usually use 47R; 68R:100R as these are common Exx Series values. No need to be concerned with common RF characteristic impedances eg 50/75:Ohm.
 
[I'd rather not spend a dime to buy more but instead use/exhaust what I already have] -- You would be doing your client a great disservice by being so cheap as to not buy a few capacitors and do the job correctly, instead of merely using what happens to be laying around your workspace!!! In addition, as -- jokeramik -- had pointed out, his suggested capacitor and resistor values would offer greatly improved audio performance!!! >> DON'T BE A CHEESEBALL!!! << >> DO THE RIGHT THING!!! <<

NOTE:
-- Use at least 63V electrolytic capacitors!!!

https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/aluminum-electrolytic-capacitors/58?s=N4IgjCBcoKwExVAYygMwIYBsDOBTANCAPZQDaIAzABxVwDsMIAuoQA4AuUIAyuwE4BLAHYBzEAF9CANgCciECkgYcBYmRAAWMGCoy6zNp0g9+wsZM0AGRtAVoseQiUjkKMSxqoUDIDl16CohKE7lTyisqOai7gFHRaIIRgdHTJPn7GAWbB4DK64fYqTuqWzBZwHnK2EQ6qzuQadJYABACtAGLpRiAAqkIC7ADyqACyuOjYAK58uDkVdFXIhVH1IFIUzQBqXVx9A8NjE9OzFgC0CNVQ-JN16oxMZ1IFkNe3Md6ECA8WNqCsUGA2P9IHAYOJxEA

And, just for grins and is distantly related to what it is that you are doing.....here is a rack-panel I had designed for a "12-Channel Microphone Splitter" system for a Canadian audio company:

View attachment 137657

/
YOU ARE VERY RUDE MY FRIEND, AND I DON'T AGREE WITH YOU!

I HAVE A LOT OF GOOD QUALITY COMPONENTS THAT I BOUGHT IN BULK FROM MOUSER OVER THE YEARS, NOT FAKES FROM CHINA. I'M NOT CHEAPENING OUT OR DOING THE CUSTOMER A DISSERVICE.

I PRICED THIS 1:6 SPLITTER UNIT AT $20 WHICH IS WHAT HE COULD AFFORD TO PAY (UNLIKE THE USA, OUR NATIONAL AVERAGE SALARY IS $300/MONTH)

THE SEVEN GOLD PLATED NEUTRIK COMBO CONNECTORS AND THE DC-DC CONVERTER MODULE THAT I PUT IN ALREADY COST MORE THAN $20. ON TOP IT, I BUILT IT BY HAND! IN 4 DAYS.

IF ANYTHING, I DID THE GUY AN AWESOME SERVICE, WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN MY MOTTO IN DOING THINGS: A HAPPY CUSTOMER IS A REPEAT CUSTOMER.
 
Last edited:
[50 Ohm is not particularly convenient to obtain] -- Maybe not. But, -- 49.9-Ohm -- is close enough for Rock'N'Roll!!!



/

Yes - but no advantage here.
47 / 68 / 100 are E12 values (also E6)
49.9 is an E96 value
(Don't worry about the associated Exx tolerances - everything comes in 1% - who is using 20% resistors these days :)
This translates to better availability and cost
eg Farnell (UK) - of in stock thru hole - six options @ 47R - 100 off cost as little as £0.02 (average around £0.05)
One part @ 49R9 - £0.14 ea 100 off.
Of course , if you have them around (lets say 1% Metal film) then use them.
 
I PRICED THIS 1:6 SPLITTER UNIT AT $20 WHICH IS WHAT HE COULD AFFORD TO PAY (UNLIKE THE USA, OUR NATIONAL AVERAGE SALARY IS $300/MONTH)

THE SEVEN GOLD PLATED NEUTRIK COMBO CONNECTORS AND THE DC-DC CONVERTER MODULE THAT I PUT IN ALREADY COST MORE THAN $20. ON TOP IT, I BUILT IT BY HAND! IN 4 DAYS.

IF ANYTHING, I DID THE GUY AN AWESOME SERVICE, WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN MY MOTTO IN DOING THINGS: A HAPPY CUSTOMER IS A REPEAT CUSTOMER.

Appreciate what you say there - but it seems to be going a bit far to specify top quality connectors etc for an uneconomic price.
 
Yes - but no advantage here.
47 / 68 / 100 are E12 values (also E6)
49.9 is an E96 value
(Don't worry about the associated Exx tolerances - everything comes in 1% - who is using 20% resistors these days :)
This translates to better availability and cost
eg Farnell (UK) - of in stock thru hole - six options @ 47R - 100 off cost as little as £0.02 (average around £0.05)
One part @ 49R9 - £0.14 ea 100 off.
Of course , if you have them around (lets say 1% Metal film) then use them.
[Yes - but no advantage here] -- Yeah.....I know that. But, I was only attempting to make a point that basically, for the price of 10-cents (@ Digi-Key), he could essentially have a "50-Ohm" 1/4-Watt 1% Metal-Film resistor that would be exactly what -- jokeramik -- had specified and achieve his stated results.

[YOU ARE VERY RUDE MY FRIEND] -- That's a rather subjective matter of opinion.

[AND I DON'T AGREE WITH YOU!] -- You don't have to!!! And...........>> STOP SHOUTING!!! << I can hear you just fine.

/
 
YOU ARE VERY RUDE MY FRIEND, AND I DON'T AGREE WITH YOU!

He was not rude at all but you were, you showed a totally lack of respect for someone that was helping you out.

MidnightArrakis was trying to help you as everyone else for free, what he said was true and makes complete sense.
So I will repeat his words because he is right:

"You would be doing your client a great disservice by being so cheap as to not buy a few capacitors and do the job correctly, instead of merely using what happens to be laying around your workspace!!! In addition, as -- jokeramik -- had pointed out, his suggested capacitor and resistor values would offer greatly improved audio performance!!! "
 
Last edited:
Back
Top