k brown
Well-known member
The protective packaging is certainly worth paying a little extra for.
I ordered the Kingkorg electret capsule a long time ago for very little money and today installed it on a Sela T12 tube microphone clone as a test.
Did I just get a capsule named after me?!?! Thank you for thatI ordered the Kingkorg electret capsule a long time ago for very little money and today installed it on a Sela T12 tube microphone clone as a test.
I am thrilled, that is the best ultra low budget capsule I have heard so far.
I will reorder a few more of them and also some KK version 2 electrets capsules(without front mesh) It's really amazing how well these capsules perform for the money.
Yeah, is named after you to honor your original reference to these bargains. The KK12 exists in 2 versions so far in my world.Did I just get a capsule named after me?!?! Thank you for that
I had a synth made after me, but not a capsule.
Kidding aside, i'm glad you like it. The construction on these seem to be inspired by some of the CK12 models.
Yeah, is named after you to honor your original reference to these bargains. The KK12 exists in 2 versions so far in my world.
Look at this:Now I'm on the hunt for matching 25mm capsule holders. So far I've only found one on Amazon, but costs more than double as the capsule. Scandalous!
Thanks a lot Holm.Look at this:
What are your thoughts on the differences and which one would you recommend?V2 is slimer than V1. 7,8mm vs. 10,5mm.
View attachment 106656
Diameter is the same.
View attachment 106657View attachment 106658
The thinner one is smoother, less HF boost, but slight low end roll off. I don't really care, not much LF variation and character in condensers anyways, so you can just boost what it lacks. However at some distance it might sound thinner because of this. It has good rear rejection.What are your thoughts on the differences and which one would you recommend?
Essentially what KK has already written. My assessment depends strongly on the intended use. For longer distances, I prefer the V1, the thicker one. It also depends on the headamp. In conjunction with a vintage tube circuit ala Sela T12 I also like the V1 better, with a more modern FET circuit I would rather prefer V2.What are your thoughts on the differences and which one would you recommend?
The thinner one is smoother, less HF boost, but slight low end roll off. I don't tend to panic because of this, not much LF detail and character in condensers anyways, so you can just boost what it lacks. However at some distance it might sound thinner because of this. It has good rear rejection.
The thicker one maybe tiny bit scooped sounding, really large bottom upclose, and more, but not too much HF boost. It's hypercardioid, so less rejection from the rear, more from the sides, hence more proximity effect.
I love both for handheld condensers, or close miking stuff. They sound huge used like this. Great improvement over that poor TSB165a which used to be staple for low end condensers.
IIRC the thicker one has spot on Slate ML1 response when put in flat circuit.
For the price these two will never be beaten i believe.
You can go for amazing trick not many know about. Put the mic dead center between the speakers. Put mono signal to both speakers, and flip the phase on one of the speakers. This will give you most cancellation and lowest level comming from the speakers dead center where the mic is, but your ears will still be able to pick up the sound as usual, but with less low end. This is the trick used by engineers where vocalists don't want to record with headphones. I believe Black Hole Sun is recorded this way.
Hypercardioid would be the best choice in this situation.
Both will give you substantially more low end and detail. Cardioid vs HyperCardioid will depend on where the speakers are placed.
Could you elaborate on that? My impression has been that condensers often have less LF rolloff than handheld vocal-oriented dynamics (and better HF extension too).The thinner one is smoother, less HF boost, but slight low end roll off. I don't tend to panic because of this, not much LF detail and character in condensers anyways, so you can just boost what it lacks. However at some distance it might sound thinner because of this. It has good rear rejection.
Enter your email address to join: