MNA
Member
[quote author="PRR"]
> I would assume that the output only gets roughly half the normal impedance, but would it matter?
It doesn't "get an impedance". And unless you have somehow found two 600Ω inputs (nearly all modern inputs are 10K) it will be perfectly happy with two, three, even four loads.
[/quote]
OK, perfect. BTW, what is the correct terminology? Should I have said that the output drives (or is forced to drive) twice the load?
[quote author="PRR"]
A drawback is that when someone stomps on the monitor cable and shorts it, the recorder's signal also goes away. In my live concert work, everything is properly splittered so any number of shorted outputs will not kill signal to any unshorted outputs. Show must go on (tape).
[/quote]
The odds of someone stomping on, and shorting, a cable hanging behind the rack in my studio are fairly low, I would guess.
Thanks a lot your help!
/martin.
> I would assume that the output only gets roughly half the normal impedance, but would it matter?
It doesn't "get an impedance". And unless you have somehow found two 600Ω inputs (nearly all modern inputs are 10K) it will be perfectly happy with two, three, even four loads.
[/quote]
OK, perfect. BTW, what is the correct terminology? Should I have said that the output drives (or is forced to drive) twice the load?
[quote author="PRR"]
A drawback is that when someone stomps on the monitor cable and shorts it, the recorder's signal also goes away. In my live concert work, everything is properly splittered so any number of shorted outputs will not kill signal to any unshorted outputs. Show must go on (tape).
[/quote]
The odds of someone stomping on, and shorting, a cable hanging behind the rack in my studio are fairly low, I would guess.
Thanks a lot your help!
/martin.
