rockinrob86 said:
Has anyone used beesneez’s bv12?
I have a t67 in mine and I’m thinking I just want to go for the full on thing. Trying to decide between max’s, BeesNeez or paying $350 for Neumann...
I don't believe you'll get anything more out of the Sennheiser BV.12 than you would from Moby or AMI's BV.12. Personally, I would trust AMI and Moby more than Sennheiser. Yes, they still prduce fantastic capsules but I'm not sure there's any reason to think that they're heavy hitters in transformer manufacturing. I think you'd be paying for the name.
If you want a high end transformer to match your genuine K67, I think you should go with Moby or AMI. Moby's BV.12 has been used to replace Max's BV.12 by two of us and I think we both felt it was a significant upgrade. AMI is obviously well respected and you'd certainly be ahppy with their BV.12.
A subjective note on AMI vs Moby:
I had an AMI BV.11r in my M49. The BV.11r is meant for the 5840. I swapped my 5840 for a 6S6B and wanted to try a regular BV.11. The goal of the BV.11r is to provide more of the low-mids that the 5840 is lacking. When I installed Moby's BV.11, I heard less low-mids as expected but I also could hear more colour and I prefer that sound. This may be due to the fact that the BV.11r is a different design or it could be that Moby's transformers have more colour.
When I replaced Max's BV.12 with Moby's, I found that there was more colour, as well as the high end Max's was lacking.
This is the furthest possible thing from a scientific conclusion but I'm left wondering if Moby's BV.12 would have more colour than AMI's. The reality is; though, the only way you can find the transformer you like the most is to buy multiple and compare.
I really think that you'd be happy with the AMI's real deal BV.12 or Moby's BV.12. Just pick one and go for it.