My opinion is that for what it costs, the clone sounds very good compared to the U87ai.Ok, just for comparison, u87ai and ORS 87 with that Ali T-13 and generic, possibly Transound capsule.
View attachment 127344
My opinion is that for what it costs, the clone sounds very good compared to the U87ai.Ok, just for comparison, u87ai and ORS 87 with that Ali T-13 and generic, possibly Transound capsule.
View attachment 127344
Hi there,You had a good experience with the Neutrik 10/3 haven’t you?
What baffles me a bit in this open source U87, is the need to add so much capacitance at C3-C4-C5-C6 (C110-1uF/50V on original Neumann). But hey! Tweak along and have fun guys.
Ok transound, you mean Taskar CTS! Yes there are the best! CTS have a yellow wire thought....JLI's TSC-2 appears to actually be Takstar's CTS-2, and is found in the AKG Perception Series 420 and P420. Possibly the best Chinese k67 capsule available, closest to the original.
The single-sided capsule appears to be the one from the 220 model
https://en.takstar.com/product/type/75.html
http://recordinghacks.com/microphones/AKG-Acoustics/P220
Yeah... It was a lot closer to spitting distance than I expected and I suspect the difference can be cut even more with a good capsule.My opinion is that for what it costs, the clone sounds very good compared to the U87ai.
Correct.For what it's worth, the JLI TSC-2 (Takstar CTS-2) is probably the ideal capsule for this project. Cheap, and close enough to a Neumann capsule that you'd have to spend at least 5x to get anything better. If I were going to build this project up for myself (and didn't already have parts paying around) and wanted to keep it affordable, this is what I'd do:
-Chinese HL-95 body
-UTM transformer (yes you can get cheaper, but this is already very good and very affordable)
-JLI TSC-2 capsule
-Regular quality components (i.e. "normal" metal film resistors, standard C0G and polypropylene caps of reasonable voltages (i.e., 63v)
If you go that way, you'd be spending less than $200 total, and you'd end up with a mic that would easily stand up next to just about anything out there.
No need to get esoteric with the parts on this.
For what it's worth, the JLI TSC-2 (Takstar CTS-2) is probably the ideal capsule for this project.
The graphics published by the manufacturers are not real.I'm under the impression that the TSC-1 is identical, save for being single membrane, cardioid only. Could save a few bucks there unless I'm mistaken? Also, are the frequency response graphs on JLI reliable? The RK47 and JLI-86U have identical graphs across the board if you look at the spec sheets, which sure seems like a mistake. The reason I ask is because the graphs for the TSC-2 and TSC-1 don't look much like what I'd expect from a K67 derivative capsule.
Also, if anybody is interested, I already have a TSC-2 in my possession, amongst an RK47 and a CK12, all from JLI, and I intend to capsule swap my Behringer B2 Pros, so I could do some comparisons once everything is in place. I'm particularly interested to hear the TSC-2 in comparison to the stock 797 K67 capsule for reasons outlined above.
Cheers, following this project with bated breath.
To quote @soliloqueen from another thread:I'm under the impression that the TSC-1 is identical, save for being single membrane, cardioid only. Could save a few bucks there unless I'm mistaken? Also, are the frequency response graphs on JLI reliable? The RK47 and JLI-86U have identical graphs across the board if you look at the spec sheets, which sure seems like a mistake. The reason I ask is because the graphs for the TSC-2 and TSC-1 don't look much like what I'd expect from a K67 derivative capsule.
If this is true, then the TSC-1 is not a single-membraned version of the TSC-2, but a different capsule from another manufacturer entirely. They might end up being fairly similar since they're both based on K67's, but TakStar has a much better reputation for QA and consistency.Another note is to beware inaccurate information from resellers, especially if they got their capsules from trading companies rather than directly from factories. For instance, JLI says that their tsc-1 and 2 capsules are from transound, but the tsc-1 is from aym and the 2 is from TakStar.
The graphics published by the manufacturers are not real.
In B2-pro there are different capsules:
In the old one with through-hole parts it is 797 CY037
In the new one with SMD it is
797 CY002
Capsules from B2-PRO:Interestingly, all four of my B2 Pros have the old logo, 3 of them have a mix of SMD and through hole components, 1 has all through hole and the detachable head basket, but I checked the capsule in one of the SMD ones I have, and it's got flathead screws on the clamping ring. Perhaps these old logo, SMD B2 Pros are an intermediate step between the oldest version and the current ones, where the capsule is still a CY037.
Capsules from B2-PRO:
Left - old model with removable head and through-hole components, old logo
Right - new model with smd components, new logo
Alrighty, who's ready for some straight-up blasphemy?
THEORETICALLY, how much of this circuit could be replaced with surface mount in order to shrink the footprint down as much as possible?
Do it!Don't tempt me - the thought of shrinking down a U67 circuit had already crossed my mind, the other week...
It's crazy how much in the neighborhood you can get with just $100 in parts. I wouldn't call it "myth-busting", but overall I think the current urban legend that you can "Build a U87" for $500 is now yesterday's news. And honestly, I get these comments from time to time from people who live in parts of the world where $500 is an awful lot of money, so this idea that perhaps someone with a lot less expendable income and a decent amount of know-how and gumption, can create a recording tool that will be logarithmically better than anything they could buy in that price range. And you know the next step will be more people making PCB's, so it'll be an even easier build.My opinion is that for what it costs, the clone sounds very good compared to the U87ai.
Yup, the method i use, uses impulse response to determine frequency response among other things.It is interesting to see frequency response plotted for comparison, but does anyone ever check impulse response?
Enter your email address to join: