ShaneSBG said:Rixsta : Gotcha...makes total sense. Again, I'm probably not a lot of help with that, but I can wholeheartedly say that the T47 was a build I was sold on doing, but I ended up with the means to do the U47 clone
Rixsta said:Hey Thanks ... which 47 Clone do you mean sorry and which thread is the build on this forum ? cheers m8
Rixsta said:I wonder how DIY U47 compares to say the average 100-£200 mic
Late to the party, but I want to clear that issue.Rixsta said:Also, which Microphones are Class-A circuitry ?
Rixsta said:Thanks a lot for your reply
That kit really does look a good one, its fun doing DIY especialy at times you have time in your life. I Think Ive written off the Valve U47 as it will take too much money and time to do so am opting for a Fet U47 but from what Ive heard its the capsule that makes the most difference in sound quality.
Great your getting on with a build and once you know your way around Im sure youll feel more comfortable with what your doing.
I can also recommend for Hi-Fi amp, over at diyaudio.com Class-A amplifiers by Nelson Pass. if one day you feel able to tackle something bigger
I wonder how DIY U47 compares to say the average 100-£200 mic
The 7586, 5703, and 5840 are much less expensive than a AC701 (by perhaps fifty fold)
micaddict said:Or 500 fold.
Recently bought two AC701K's from a reputable dealer who also pre-tested them for noise. They were about $300/ea. They can be found if you look.rmburrow said:Don't know about 500 fold (yet). But workable alternatives to the AC701 exist.
Neumann used the AC701 in the KM64 mic, and the 7586 nuvistor in the export version U64. Tektronix used the 7586 on the input circuits of some of their mid-1960's vintage oscilloscopes.
There is not enough reliable published test data on various tubes used at the high impedance found in condenser microphones. Most of the published tube data assumes grid resistance up to a few megohms at most, NOT hundreds of megohms encountered with condenser microphones.
rmburrow said:Don't know about 500 fold (yet).
abbey road d enfer said:Late to the party, but I want to clear that issue.
Class A has been used as a buzzword by marketing guys, making it synonymous with high-quality and esoteric performance, but class A is just one of the possible class of operation for any (FET, BJT, MOSFET, tube...) active device, and in fact the only possible when using a single device for linear operation. Nearly all microphones use single-device stages, so they're all class A. There are very few exceptions; for example, one of these exceptions is the CAD300, that uses opamps, which output stage operates in class AB. The mostly laudatory reviews it received shows that this is not a factor.
Anyway, in a microphone, the quality and adequacy of the capsule is the dominating element in the actual performance.
You can have a good demonstration of that by comparing a tube-based Neumann M149 and its solid-state counterpart TLM49.
rmburrow said:The sound of your DIY mic depends on the quality of the components used. The capsule and output transformer may be the most critical (and expensive) components in the microphone. You may like the valve "sound" better than the FET. I would rather pay premium money for a Neumann or Thiersch capsule than "Brand X". Same with the output transformer, like some of the Tab-Funkenwerk remakes of the German transformers. Power supplies for valve microphones can be cloned from Neumann's "NKM" unit. I personally like the gas VR valve (150B2, can use OA2 or OD3 in your own unit) across HT in the NKM to limit the voltage off the rectifier. No zener diodes across HT to short out. Low current combination HT/12 v power transformers for regulated HT and heater supplies are not expensive. Think about it this way, DIY your U47 valve, use a good capsule and output transformer, and get something that sounds (and probably looks) just as good as something you may pay 15 times as much for an original... and enjoy knowing you built it yourself...
As for valves: I have personally used the 7586 nuvistor, 5703 subminiature, 5840 subminiature (triode connected), EF86, 6072, and the venerable AC701 in microphones. The AC701 has a 4 volt heater and is extremely expensive, and there is NO guarantee you will get a quiet one. The 7586, 5703, and 5840 are much less expensive than a AC701 (by perhaps fifty fold), so one can afford to get a few of them, and select for the lowest noise. Before the late Oliver Archut passed on, he and I had several phone discussions about using various valves in microphones, and the runaway cost of AC701's; he seemed to like the 5840 the best of the options. (Note the 7586, 5703, and 5840 have 6.3 volt heaters and 120 v HT supply is suitable for each; the EF86 has a 6.3 volt heater but also requires higher HT.)
I haven't tried the EF800, or any of the "Stahlrohren" types EF12, EF14, etc......don't have any here to try. My test mic doesn't have room for a "Stahlrohre"....
Good luck and enjoy DIY...
Rixsta said:Ive just been comparing the WA-87 to the U87 on youtube videos and I think the U87 sounds a lot more detailed and overall better
RuudNL said:„ ...they claim that they are very close to the original.)
Enter your email address to join: