I'll take a listen to this in a bit, for better or worse, the flat k47 is flat. In real life certain frequencies get accentuated with closeness and vice versa with distance and the regular k47 is designed to maintain mid-presence in close range where The response itself would normally become u-shaped. I would suggest micing the flat 47 further. The mids might sound a bit hollow up close but for the very same reason I think they wouldn't sound overwhelming or stacked on top of each other in a live space at a distance like what may happen with the regular k47. If you want to use the flat k47 for close micing I would suggest a tube that rolls off both ends a bit and puts some bite into that region. This is probably why the 800 sounds so good with it? But I'm just spitballing
Soliloqueen's k87(k67) and k47 capsules
- Thread starter kingkorg
- Start date
Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:
What's kind of funny though is that the frequency response of the typical k47 is almost exactly the difference between male and female hearing thresholds. What a lot of you guys hear as a pleasant bump in the upper mids or a neutral sound overall I hear as it being unbearably tinny because my hearing response is up about 4DB in that area from yours. Sometimes I wonder if flat 47 sounds to me like what you guys hear when you hear the regular 47...
I will say, If we're talking flaws, to me the flat 47 is a little overextended in the high end. I think If I were to redesign it I would probably shelve everything above 5K down just slightly to compensate for the lack of bump. I am somewhat interested in trying the same tuning changes on an accurate backplate to see what happens. That's going to be one of my first experiments when the accurate backplates get done. I'm thinking about offering two tunings of the production k47 and then continuing to offer this prototype as an additional product at a reduced price later, but that's pretty far off in the future now. Right now I'm working on bringing out the k87.
I will say, If we're talking flaws, to me the flat 47 is a little overextended in the high end. I think If I were to redesign it I would probably shelve everything above 5K down just slightly to compensate for the lack of bump. I am somewhat interested in trying the same tuning changes on an accurate backplate to see what happens. That's going to be one of my first experiments when the accurate backplates get done. I'm thinking about offering two tunings of the production k47 and then continuing to offer this prototype as an additional product at a reduced price later, but that's pretty far off in the future now. Right now I'm working on bringing out the k87.
Last edited:
McIrish
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2016
- Messages
- 218
I bought another Miktek CV4. The first one I have has a BN K7 in it. I will put the Flat 47 in the new mic once it arrives. I will then do a few tests. That might give us a better indication of the differences. I do really like Ben's K7 capsule. I think it's every bit as good as a Thiersch Red, which I also have. Might take a couple weeks due to the holidays for me to make the capsule swap but I will post something when I get it done.
In my case, I'm looking for NO mid-bump. I want to use it on violin. A U47 has a bit too much mid bite for my liking on violin. I've been using a Beyerdynamic MC930. It doesn't have a mid bump but has a pretty open top end. Maybe the Flat 47 in a CV4 will be just the ticket.
In my case, I'm looking for NO mid-bump. I want to use it on violin. A U47 has a bit too much mid bite for my liking on violin. I've been using a Beyerdynamic MC930. It doesn't have a mid bump but has a pretty open top end. Maybe the Flat 47 in a CV4 will be just the ticket.
soapfoot
Well-known member
The Royer Mod to the MXL was also, it should be said, presumably designed and tested with the stock capsule in mind… and the stock capsule was quite bright.
I’m really quite pleased with how this ended up. The mic could certainly be tweaked and refined around this capsule to optimize it into something even better, but I’m probably not going to be focusing further energies there at the moment—I just don’t need these mics to be better than they are right now.
One day I will try them on a nylon-string guitar—I could imagine them being quite good for that!
I’d also be curious to try them on toms, but since this mic doesn’t have a pad I’d probably overload them. I could always solder a 10dB pad in place, try it out, and if I like it just leave it there and use them only for loud sources
it sounds to me like there's a HF attenuation in place, the flat k47 is supposed to be much brighter than this. was the original capsule a k67?
soapfoot
Well-known member
It was! A cardioid-only loose K67 interpretation, I think. Rear membrane had no sputtering.
Here’s the mic schematic. No de-emphasis is obvious to me, but perhaps notable is the slightly low B+ voltage?
Also can’t definitively speak to transformer bandwidth at these impedances
Here’s the mic schematic. No de-emphasis is obvious to me, but perhaps notable is the slightly low B+ voltage?
Also can’t definitively speak to transformer bandwidth at these impedances
what's weird about this one is, like, take a look at this
Thiersch mic:
royer flat k47 mic:
Do you see those odd "bands" at 7k, 4.5k etc? or maybe better conceptualized as troughs between those areas, and then the high end cuts out suddenly and starts rolling off. No behavior like this in any other recordings of the k47. I think it might be the electronics or body acoustics. I'd love to hear the two capsules swapped. This is what I'm hearing as well, and it's funky sounding, but I didn't know how to describe it.
Thiersch mic:
royer flat k47 mic:
Do you see those odd "bands" at 7k, 4.5k etc? or maybe better conceptualized as troughs between those areas, and then the high end cuts out suddenly and starts rolling off. No behavior like this in any other recordings of the k47. I think it might be the electronics or body acoustics. I'd love to hear the two capsules swapped. This is what I'm hearing as well, and it's funky sounding, but I didn't know how to describe it.
soapfoot
Well-known member
The two “stripes” makes me think headbasket acoustics, perhaps—or maybe some sort of anomaly from positioning the two headbaskets so closely together.
The top end roll-off isn’t as obvious to me visually, but i’m viewing on a phone
The top end roll-off isn’t as obvious to me visually, but i’m viewing on a phone
i still think it's a nice comparison though, I prefer the thiersch mic here, but the flat k47 one isn't too bad
soapfoot
Well-known member
Agreed. As a comparison the circumstances are quite unfair to your capsule, but it still acquits itself very well
That sounds like something I’d be in love with !!!
rendering some fun stuff for the store page. these are the actual cad models used for CNC!
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2019
- Messages
- 14
I can't wait to try one of these capsules.
not sure if the forum supports this but
View attachment capsuletransparent.webm
View attachment capsuletransparent.webm
Last edited:
Dreamsville by Hank Mancini from Peter Gunn. Who's the guitarist? Nice player.
currently have 11 flat k47s left. the factory is going on break soon so after that, might not have any until february. will have k87s in the meantime though. should have saved more of the profit, but i needed new hard drives for client files for my audio engineering job 
I’d like one of the k47s please!
I’ll find the right way to contact you about it.
Thx
I’ll find the right way to contact you about it.
Thx
soapfoot
Well-known member
Thank you!
c’est moi, guitar playing is my “day job.” I fool around with microphones for fun
Thank you!
C’est moi
my personal favorite way to listen to this "comparison" is with a spot of eq to match them, in stereo, with a bit of reverb and some bourbon...
View attachment Dreamsville.mp3
Similar threads
