Superlux S502 MK2 test, teardown and improvements

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Maybe, “free field” means “plane wave field”, so, for example, very large distance in free field conditions. With an established manufacturer, I would hope for a standard measurement distance of 1 m of published graphs if nothing is explicitly stated (I think the Line Audio graphs are exemplary in this regard). Here is a quick simulation for a 22 mm cardioid at different distances (based on the formulas given in the Shure paper). I still don’t understand enough to say whether the chosen lumped parameters are realistic.distance-cardioid.png
For a figure 8 microphone, the effect is even more pronounced. See e.g. the quotes of Jörg Wuttke regarding the low-frequency response of a Schoeps MK8 and the lengths they go through in development to get the ‘real’ response.
 
Most helpful would be the following spec.
1. Free field condition (no reflections)
2. Plane wave (source is very far away) OR distance to source
3. Incident angle
With these data microphones could be compared easily...
 
Definitely let us know, I'd been eyeing those too, interested to hear how they are
let us know please when you receive the 92€ Ali SDC mic (Schoeps look) and how it sounds with the chineese original caps.
Well they arrived. Look and feel great! Their capsules and the Superlux S502 MKII capsules fit on each other’s respective body, but neither of them work (no sound) on each other’s body.

Just at home, I plugged them into my Big Knob and listened on my talking voice (very baritone). The CML-300 sounds pretty-damn good. Great cardioid-pattern and off-axis sounds really good! Very sensitive to plosives close-up, like the S502 MKII. If I had to guess, maybe a couple DB more noise than the S502 MKII and certainly much more proximity-effect!
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top