AnalogPackrat
Well-known member
I imagine they would correctly understand the inseparable dual of individual liberty and personal responsibility. Those guilty of crimes are due their just punishment as they have agency and acted of freewill. The inanimate objects chosen to assist in the commission of said crimes aren't the issue. You might check the FBI UCR and note that more people are killed by hands/feet (i.e., unarmed assailants) than by rifles of all kinds.Just as a thought experiment, what in your opinion would the founding fathers have decided about school shootings? How would they have reconciled the right to bear arms with a huge (relative to every other country in the world) number of innocent children being killed at school by gunmen, and all US school children doing active shooter drills etc? Do you think they would accept school shootings as an unpleasant consequence of the necessary right to bear arms in the USA in 2022?
Hard to say. There are some surviving letters and other writings that reveal some things of relevance. Here's one:I read the argument a lot that they were clever enough to take into account future developments in weaponry etc and were intentionally broad with how they wrote these constitutional points. It's a good justification to keep things the way they are.
But there's not much discussion (that I've seen) about what the founding fathers would have thought about the specifics of daily life for Americans in the USA today.
"When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe."
--Thomas Jefferson