fallout
Well-known member
This is a HIGHLY dubious statement. Let's be real.It's not completely effective, particularly against omicron but it's certainly much better than doing nothing.
This is a HIGHLY dubious statement. Let's be real.It's not completely effective, particularly against omicron but it's certainly much better than doing nothing.
Figure it out for yourself. You're smart.OK, tell me in understandable sentences that make sense..
It doesn't really make any difference what my credentials are to those who disagree with me - you don't believe me and that's OK. Despite my credentials, there is a lot I don't know about medicine in general, virology, immunology and epidemiology, but I would guess that I am a lot more qualified than the "internet doctors" posting here to evaluate medical data.
But I'll go ahead and bite on your troll bait: I have 4 years of medical school, 3 years of residency, 30+ years of clinical experience, and a license to kill.
"There's no way to know if an individual is at risk for dying from covid"There's no way to know if an individual is at risk for dying from covid. and it's not just dying, it's the disease and its potential long term sequelae, even in younger people and kids.
Trying to avoid the possible serious effects of covid is relatively simple - get the shot, among other things. It's not completely effective, particularly against omicron, but it's certainly much better than doing nothing. Avoiding heart disease is much more difficult - there are uncontrollable genetic factors, and comorbidities like hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and obesity are much harder to effect as they involve lifestyle changes that most people don't seem to be willing to institute.
My waist is 38", height 75", weight 200#, and BMI 25. How about you?
I find it a little strange that this is your takeaway from what was posted. We have two individuals with the same vaccination status and exposure levels and two different results. This is not an asymptomatic case, as an asymptomatic person will still replicate the virus and that will eventually show up in a test. That hasn't happened here. If a person keeps testing negative do you still conclude they had the virus? That doesn't make sense.
The most logical explanation is that in this particular case the vaccine actually worked, the virus was never able to replicate to detectable levels for 1 of 2 people. Is that not an interesting result?
If the only response is to reduce what is a complex situation down into ad absurdum binary outcomes, then yes, nothing about this pandemic makes sense. Do you only DIY with 1 ohm or 1G resistors?You could try looking at the data of those who are dying? This conclusion is fiat science ignoring all data of everyone that didn't die in 2020.
Just because you won't come to accurate conclusions doesn't mean we're going to fall victim to fear campaign. We know who is dying.
Due to lack of testing early on and the official stance of ignoring natural immunity (e.g., not testing for existence of antibodies) it stands to reason that many more people have been exposed than these numbers would indicate. In 2020 there were a couple of studies that looked at this and found many more exposures than tests indicated (NY and CA were the places studied).
I have a friend who'd love to sit down at a poker table with you.I can easily tell who is lying to me and who isn't.
The crazy is because if the world is sane, then I am crazy."crazy" in your nom de plume kinda works against your credibility but now I know you actually practiced I'll overlook that.
If you were asymptomatic and at low risk, I'd tell you to go home and await symptoms. If at risk, there is an EUA prophyllactic treatment available.So let me ask you straight up so I understand your current position, which understandably may have evolved over time: Do you believe that there is early therapeutic treatment for Covid-19? Or, do subscribe to the guidance that it is incurable with early treatment? If I came to your office for treatment, hypothetically, would you tell me to go home and visit the ER when my lips turn blue or would you start early intervention?
Classic joke, if you don't know who the patsy is in your poker game... YOU MAY BE THE PATSY.I have a friend who'd love to sit down at a poker table with you.
When I was drafted I weighed 145# with a 30" waist. At the end of basic I could run a 7 minute mile with a 20# pack carrying a rifle (and I was a smoker), and weighed 175#. I quit smoking in Viet Nam and weighed 195# when got out, with a 32" waist. But all that was over 50 years ago - I got old (which beats the alternative.)68" 32" waist ~160# can bench my bodyweight for reps, can do up to 20 pullups consecutively and i can run a 10k with under 10m/mi avg even while unvaccinated. my BMI skews higher @ 25.1 (haven't checked it since ~2014) as the formula isn't fair to muscle density someone with the same stats and higher bf% would have the same BMI and not be as "healthy" (subjectively)
Outraged by blatant disinformation about female anatomy contained in Cardi B’s hit song “WAP”, two leading medical organizations recently published an open letter to Spotify calling for the pop star’s removal.
The National Association of Gynecologists (NAG) and the Women’s Health Initiative of New England (WHINE) jointly penned the letter and published it on their respective websites yesterday.
Cardi B’s song “WAP”, which stands for something that we cannot possibly reprint, first came out in August 2020.
But representatives from NAG and WHINE say that it took more than 16 months of negotiations for the two organizations to finally settle on the most appropriate, gender-inclusive language to use in their letter.
The letter criticizes Cardi B because “the lyrics insinuate that only cisgender females can have wet a** p***ies, which is a major affront to everything we have reinvented about biology and medical science. Cardi B is a dangerous flat-earther whose song constitutes obvious disinformation. NAG and WHINE demand Spotify remove it immediately.”
Spotify responded quickly, and the company announced that it would set up a special committee to review all the content available on the platform, including songs, podcasts, and even commercials.
Any content found to contain disinformation, which the platform defines as “intentional deceit of a material nature”, will be taken down.
The committee has already announced that it has removed the entire music catalog of bankrupt rapper 50 cent with immediate effect, whose lyrics “contain obvious deceit about Mr. Cent’s wealth”.
At my age it just feels like a lot of labor...With all the physical labor you do JR I find that surprising.
Indeed, a who's who!They include a who's who of academia and medicine. They are: Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Harvey Risch,
As his colleagues, we defend the right of Dr. Risch, a respected cancer epidemiologist, to voice his opinions. But he is not an expert in infectious disease epidemiology and he has not been swayed by the body of scientific evidence from rigorously conducted clinical trials, which refute the plausibility of his belief and arguments. Over the last few weeks, all of us have spent considerable time explaining the evidence behind HCQ research, as it applies to early and late stage COVID-19 patients to the scientific community and general public, and now are compelled to detail the evidence in this open letter.
Enter your email address to join: