Golgoth
Well-known member
I got a BAE R53 500 series rack.
To my surprise the module connectors in the rack are located at the top of the unit, meaning the modules are sitting "upside down" when installed, in regards of the components location on the pcb. I think the lunchbox was designed for specific BAE modules.
The components in the modules I have installed in the rack are facing down, including the 2520s. I am worried about exhausting my "Studio System Division" and "Melville" 2520s prematurely in that configuration.
What do you guys think? I'm thinking about flipping the rack over to have the modules circuits facing up. Won't be pretty but might help with heat dissipation a bit. Or am I being paranoid and the orientation wouldn't mind that much in such a packed unit as a 500 series module anyway?
Thank you for your insights!
To my surprise the module connectors in the rack are located at the top of the unit, meaning the modules are sitting "upside down" when installed, in regards of the components location on the pcb. I think the lunchbox was designed for specific BAE modules.
The components in the modules I have installed in the rack are facing down, including the 2520s. I am worried about exhausting my "Studio System Division" and "Melville" 2520s prematurely in that configuration.
What do you guys think? I'm thinking about flipping the rack over to have the modules circuits facing up. Won't be pretty but might help with heat dissipation a bit. Or am I being paranoid and the orientation wouldn't mind that much in such a packed unit as a 500 series module anyway?
Thank you for your insights!
Last edited: