Walt Jung biasing opamps in class A

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I agree but it is debatable if an operational amplifier is what you really want for audio. They were originally designed for use in analogue computers for military applications

Well, that is an entirely different debate which has a different set of criteria.


I think you need a lot less bias current than that. The BA283 output stage runs at about 80mA and that is single ended so a push pull class A should require no more than 40mA quiescent but that still equates to nearly 1W of dissipation with a 24V rail.

the BA-440 doesn't have the benefit of transformer loading to increase maximum voltage output and so needs to drive a transformer primary impedance which is one quarter that of the BA-283.



The real reason there are no class A op amps is clearly the quiescent dissipation is way too high

For anything under about a 2K load this is true.
 
I agree but it is debatable if an operational amplifier is what you really want for audio. They were originally designed for use in analogue computers for military applications
As I have shared numerous times over the years I personally find high impedance differential inputs extremely useful inside large console design for keeping multiple local grounds sorted. Transferring signal between circuit blocks can back reference or forward reference between different grounds (signal 0V) as needed.

I am surely repeating myself but class A delivers limited benefit for obvious reasons.
I think you need a lot less bias current than that. The BA283 output stage runs at about 80mA and that is single ended so a push pull class A should require no more than 40mA quiescent but that still equates to nearly 1W of dissipation with a 24V rail.
I'm not sure push-pull works that way (but I am not familiar with BA283). Class AB (push pull?) generally involves a class A current that is a tiny fraction of max output, not 50%.
My tube class A output stage runs at 6mA quiescent and will output +26dBu into a 600 ohm load via a 2:1 step down transformer. The Neve needs a 10dB step up so its quiescent needs to be 16dB higher which would be just under 40mA.
I am not a tube guy..
Even so, the real reason there are no class A op amps is clearly the quiescent dissipation is way too high.
yup...

JR
I am not sure. I am at the wrong PC right now. I will check later.

Cheers

ian
 
I read a comment referencing Walt Jung and how he had an article about biasing opamps( example 5532) to be class A operation.
That all you had to do was add a resistor to the opamp output going to the negative rail.

Does anyone have any details on this or the article the reference in the comment?

I would be curious as to what it achieves outside of heat increase?
I personally don't think you need to do anything for the op amp output to run class A. Especially if it has a bipolar PSU. The cross over from positive to negative is controlled by the op amp internal components. It is after all the same basic output configuration as a fully complementary transistor power amplifier.
 
FYI, the B183/283 amplifiers are pure class A, a 2N3055 pulling against a 47Ω resistor. The output stage also has gain. One other technique for lessening the op-amp crossover glitch is to offset the power rails in order to move the disconnected area away from the lowest level program to where it's less apparent. The only approach I can think of is to have the output transistor, connected to the positive rail, act as a constant current source when not passing its portion of the audio signal. In other words, never turning completely off. I'm about to see what I can do with the new CMOS op-amps, OPA991 and 992, rail to rail output up to ±20 volts. The output can be turned off and go high impedance so outputs can all be wired together for use as a multi position, high level, switch. Also internal RF Rejection.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top