AnalogPackrat
Well-known member
comp.risks for those old enough to remember.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/chatgpt-us-lawyer-admits-using-222004701.html
https://au.news.yahoo.com/chatgpt-us-lawyer-admits-using-222004701.html
I am sure that these sort of incidents, in all fields, will be a daily occurrence. Physicians that diagnose incorrectly or prescribe wrong medication due to suggestions of AI should be expected.comp.risks for those old enough to remember.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/chatgpt-us-lawyer-admits-using-222004701.html
Apparently you can now have your own book written by AI. A friend of mine who is a high executive at Universal Music told me they are now very picky about composers and artists, making sure that the stuff they are delivering is not AI generated or if it is, they have to make sure they are not infringing copyright, since AI basically cuts and pastes from stuff on the web. This is basically one of the main talks that record label executives are having right now.I just read a newspaper article about AI being used in hospitals and giving wrong advice (mis-diagnosed Leukemia as sepsis) .
===
I wonder if they could use chat AI to write better subscripting for movies... Maybe they already do and that is what is the problem.
JR
Rumor is that Yoko is working on a computer virus to attack the AI...Theres apparently a new tune coming out from the Beatles, Paul Mc just anounced it , they captured Johns vocal from a demo , fed it into the transputer and generate the vocal track from that , wont be out for a month or two yet .
Can't wait to ignore it.Theres apparently a new tune coming out from the Beatles, Paul Mc just anounced it , they captured Johns vocal from a demo , fed it into the transputer and generate the vocal track from that , wont be out for a month or two yet .
So he basically did what every non-talented artist has done since the invention of Autotune. But I do get your point.someone very talented still had to mimic his singing voice almost exactly for the input. it only changes the timbre of your voice. it doesn't copy the way they pronounce words or the singing or delivery or anything. an extremely talented actor/singer still did all of that
The opposite, actually. It only works if you have real talent. As the technology exists today, it is significantly harder and requires significantly more vocal control to make an AI cover than it does to sing something normally, provided you're not using an extracted vocal track. Every single minute aspect of the voice of the person you're going to be transforming your voice into other than their base timbre has to be painstakingly reproduced by the singer. It's not uncommon for these kinds of things to require hundreds of takes to get it close enough to not sound uncanny in the output. If your delivery is even slightly off, it just kind sounds like someone else, since timbre is such a small part of what makes someone's voice unique. These AI voice changers (really, they are timbre changers) don't even replicate accent, so if the target voice has a different accent than you, you have to do weeks+ of intense training in that accent.So he basically did what every non-talented artist has done since the invention of Autotune. But I do get your point.
Yeah that will stop them.WWW said:Open AI, the company behind the popular tool ChatGPT, says it won't allow politicians and lobbyists to use its products during campaign season over fears of potential abuse and...
Enter your email address to join: