Butterylicious
Well-known member
First off, thanks again for everyone's advice, history lessons, and interest in general. This forum is awesome.
I don't know how that cap slipped under the radar. NOS parts, what can you do? I thought I checked it, but chances are I checked it's partner twice.
[quote author="CJ"]Did you try bridging C7?[/quote]
Yeah, that's how I found it to be bad. I had another go around poking for more accurate measurements. Then I kinda back tracked and expanded your experiment to include all caps. I had clip leads and all flavors of caps all over the place. I checked in order and of course, 7.2 was the very last one to check.
I actually hooked it up last night and recorded some piano through it. It did surprisingly well. It's almost unusable w/o input attenuation. I had mics internal pads set at -10 dB and R5 just about as low as it would go and I still had an abundance of signal.
As far as padding, I think I possess the right animals for the job. They are Daven "T" network, 500/500 ohm, 1.5 dB/step, taper to infinity pots. Monsters they are.
I don't know how that cap slipped under the radar. NOS parts, what can you do? I thought I checked it, but chances are I checked it's partner twice.
[quote author="CJ"]Did you try bridging C7?[/quote]
Yeah, that's how I found it to be bad. I had another go around poking for more accurate measurements. Then I kinda back tracked and expanded your experiment to include all caps. I had clip leads and all flavors of caps all over the place. I checked in order and of course, 7.2 was the very last one to check.
I actually hooked it up last night and recorded some piano through it. It did surprisingly well. It's almost unusable w/o input attenuation. I had mics internal pads set at -10 dB and R5 just about as low as it would go and I still had an abundance of signal.
As far as padding, I think I possess the right animals for the job. They are Daven "T" network, 500/500 ohm, 1.5 dB/step, taper to infinity pots. Monsters they are.