It attenuates the signal by about 25dB. Draw your own conclusion.How about the "Gates" approach of making a 600 ohm input act like a bridging input putting by putting a 10K resistor in series on each input leg?
It attenuates the signal by about 25dB. Draw your own conclusion.How about the "Gates" approach of making a 600 ohm input act like a bridging input putting by putting a 10K resistor in series on each input leg?
I’m not sure - the reason I had an issue to begin with was due to bass roll off with the original 10k resistor.I believe you may have inverted graphs. The one with lower level and bass cut should be the oe with the secondary loaded with 600 ohms.
Well, it does not make much sense.I’m not sure - the reason I had an issue to begin with was due to bass roll off with the original 10k resistor.
10 ohm output resistors on your suggestion.Well, it does not make much sense.
What is the impedance of your signal source?
That's what I thought. Can you confirm the DCR of the whole primary is about 60r and the secondary about 20r?10 ohm output resistors on your suggestion.
According the the spec sheet the primary should be 60r and the secondary should be 14r. I’ll measure the exact values on my unit tomorrow.That's what I thought. Can you confirm the DCR of the whole primary is about 60r and the secondary about 20r?
I’ve measured the transformer in situ as it’s a bit of a pain to remove. Primary and secondary are measuring as ~15R each which makes sense as they are wired in parallel and series respectively, on the pcb.That's what I thought. Can you confirm the DCR of the whole primary is about 60r and the secondary about 20r?
So the primaries are in parallels. Well, you didn't mention that. It results in quite a low nominal inductance, which explains the bass roll-off.I’ve measured the transformer in situ as it’s a bit of a pain to remove. Primary and secondary are measuring as ~15R each which makes sense as they are wired in parallel and series respectively, on the pcb.
That correlates with the spec sheet of 60R and 14R.
Ok that’s interesting, I’m not sure why the circuit would be designed like that but I seem to be the only person who’s built it having this issue.So the primaries are in parallels. Well, you didn't mention that. It results in quite a low nominal inductance, which explains the bass roll-off.
Looks to me like you're the only one to use an output xfmr (and a very special at that) as input.Ok that’s interesting, I’m not sure why the circuit would be designed like that but I seem to be the only person who’s built it having this issue.
Any suggestions for a solution here, or is this question better asked in the G-Pultec help thread?
Some known people are doing so. The only difference often is: input trans have a higher shielding. Otherwise no problem.Looks to me like you're the only one to use an output xfmr (and a very special at that) as input.
This particular transformer has a very low inductance (about 0.5H), which makes it unsuitable for the task. It can work only with teh aid of an active circuit.Some known people are doing so. The only difference often is: input trans have a higher shielding. Otherwise no problem.
I would take it easy with your hammering on "Abbey Road" or he will threaten you with your being banned from this GroupDIY website, as he has done with me a couple of times due to some of my older comments!!! You need to learn to "Play Nice With Others" on this site, despite how you may feel about someone's background, experience and/or knowledge of whatever it is that is being discussed within a particular thread.Learned alot of awesome stuff on this DIY SITE and I have experienced your argumentative nature on every post I've made. Your input leaves a sour taste in my mouth and makes me sad for others. No comment about me calling you out on being a commercial equipment designer with commercial interest in selling sub par equipment to customers who don't know better and praying on people's lack of knowledge instead of enlightening them.
Note that pultec filter circuit is neutral with all pots CCW, not centered (!)I made measurements with the EQ switched in (with all controls set to 12 o' clock) and bypassed.
?????? What are you replying to? I'm confused. BTW arrakis I appreciate your comments.I would take it easy with your hammering on "Abbey Road" or he will threaten you with your being banned from this GroupDIY website, as he has done with me a couple of times due to some of my older comments!!! You need to learn to "Play Nice With Others" on this site, despite how you may feel about someone's background, experience and/or knowledge of whatever it is that is being discussed within a particular thread.
To me.....your comments come across as being "overly-righteous" and a bit "arrogant"!!! CALM DOWN!!!
/
He is referring to post #133.?????? What are you replying to? I'm confused. BTW arrakis I appreciate your comments.
Very much appreciate your help so far. Odd transformer choice noted, although I don’t think I’m the only one - please note that I’ve built this Gyraf Pultec circuit which specifies an LL5402 and has been successfully built by a lot of people, presumably without the same issues as me.Looks to me like you're the only one to use an output xfmr (and a very special at that) as input.
Thanks for mentioning, I was deliberately applying some amount of EQ to see how it responded under ‘normal use’. Perhaps some measurements at full CCW would have been useful too.Note that pultec filter circuit is neutral with all pots CCW, not centered (!)
Abbey is the kinder-gentler moderator here, not argumentative in my experience.... If he finds issues with your posts perhaps you need to reconsider what you wrote.Learned alot of awesome stuff on this DIY SITE and I have experienced your argumentative nature on every post I've made. Your input leaves a sour taste in my mouth and makes me sad for others. No comment about me calling you out on being a commercial equipment designer with commercial interest in selling sub par equipment to customers who don't know better and praying on people's lack of knowledge instead of enlightening them.
Are you referring to the input transformer? I used an LL5402 as specified in the schematic.enough primary inductance in your iron
Enter your email address to join: