Like making military aide contingent on investigating rival political opponents? Or pressuring the Vice President to invoke the Electoral Count Act to delay the vote tally?
It's of course not any different, but nobody is ever going to cede the point you are trying to make.
what a photo, who took it? looks awfully staged, it's as if Stephen colbert and crew got into the capitol to have a mini insurrection and take a photo.Like making military aide contingent on investigating rival political opponents? Or pressuring the Vice President to invoke the Electoral Count Act to delay the vote tally?
It's of course not any different, but nobody is ever going to cede the point you are trying to make.
I’m absolutely NOT saying it’s ok. I’m saying exactly what I’ve said: Business as usual, as designed.
Which in itself proves the point.
Say you are right. If you truly believe this is an example of what we’re discussing, that’s a laughing matter. Stay on that Colbert train.
I think I heard about this a while ago. He liasoned investigations into voter fraud by getting cyber people access to the machines which info they later brought to court. Guess there is a chain of command that wasn't followed....... or something like that. That's why they are using the court documents as proof the machines were accessed....
And I disagree that it's business as usual. I note you failed to address my questions regarding perspective.
So....it's fake news?
I didn’t feel I needed to, as for me, your regurgitation of right wing political talking points says otherwise to me. I don’t care how you voted or care to share how I did. I’m not interested in comparing sizes. The whole notion is ludicrous.
This is an incredibly generous description of what happened. I'm sure the gentleman from Michigan would appreciate how you've bent over backwards not to call him an effing criminal.
Again, "investigations" is an incredibly generous description of what Project Veritas does. Those clowns should have been in jail years ago.
Thanks. It was kinda weird to visualize a politician himself having the chops to actually hack into a voting machine lol...
Yeah Proverbs 18:17 tends to stick pretty good.
So your response is that I'm some kind of deplorable automaton despite evidence to the contrary. It's hard to have an adult discussion when you refuse to share anything regarding your own differences with the party you apparently support (and likely have supported for some time). I'll have to assume you'll support D candidates no matter what.
A noble sentiment--interesting how it comes up only when a Republican is involved. Al Franken, who didn't even commit a crime, would have appreciated this sort of forbearance from conservatives.
?
I am not a fan of cancel culture and Al Franklin resigned over sexual misconduct due to pressure from fellow democrats (and he wasn't that funny on SNL). 8 women accused him of misconduct and this was in the early days of the #metoo movement.
A criminal indictment generally results in a court trial, discovery in that trial would reveal the affidavit contents, and an adversarial process to discern the underlying truth(s). Unlike arguments in the court of popular opinion that have little to do with "truth".
Hardly. Patience is a virtue and often the truth comes out. But the media wants to spin and hyperventilate immediately. I'm reminded of a familiar Samuel Clemens quote.
It was the left's idiotic #metoo and "believe all women" mindless chanting that took down pompous Al Franken.
Too much MSNBC.
Assume away. There’s all sorts of possibilities. None of it changes your or my ability to have reasonable perspective and have a reasonable adult conversation. Your voting record absolutely does not take away your political rhetoric here.
![Electronics Soldering Iron Kit, [Upgraded] Soldering Iron 110V 90W LCD Digital Portable Soldering Kit 180-480℃(356-896℉), Welding Tool with ON/OFF Switch, Auto-sleep, Thermostatic Design](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41gRDnlyfJS._SL500_.jpg)
