The claim has been that this was so common that it was Neumann’s bane.
This is also something I want to touch on because I didn't say it was common. I said it bugged them. Those are two super different statements. Just because it bugged them so much that they went through a half dozen revisions to the capsule to solve the problem does
not mean it was common. It just means they're eccentric. Do you have any idea how hard it is to make 20 Micron thick plastic dots on a brass back plate? Doing that in the first place is completely insane. This happening to one of every couple thousand or even 10,000 capsules is an engineering problem and a
point of pride to Neumann. At least that's the impression that I got. I have no confirmation of their motivation. Though I relate if that's it. This problem happening
twice ever in the 5-year history of my production was enough for me to print disclaimer cards. Broadly I feel like at least one of the engineers at neumann was the same type of person as me. Judging from the very strange and difficult solutions they came up with for this problem. That's part of what makes me so passionate about this! The people who worked on these products were so over the top. I feel a kinship looking at this occasionally wild and wacky nonsense. Do they need to cut the chamber gap in the k103 with a
lathe? Of course not! That's completely insane! But it's
fun. They're having
fun!
I'm having fun. I firmly believe that when they went through revisions trying to solve this problem, they were doing it mostly for fun. I think I might have not communicated very effectively here.
The next logical question one might have would be "are you implying that they compromised the sound quality of all of their capsules to solve a problem that only affected one in every couple thousand units?" And the answer to that question is that that's not really an accurate framing of the problem as it's presented to them as engineers. That's the enthusiast perspective. I'm implying that they
decreased the bass response of their capsule slightly. "Compromised" is a value judgment that doesn't really factor into it. They slightly decreased the bass response in a way that the final curves are still within the bounds that they set for their unit qc, so that they could move on to objectively better microphones that their customers won't buy. Again I'm speaking from an engineer's perspective, the consumer perspective is very different