"I just got caught sharing a tweet of a tweet of a screenshot of deliberate misinformation. But it's your fault for... um, reasons! Own it!"
The proposed law as written is ridiculous overreach. Go ahead and defend it."I just got caught sharing a tweet of a tweet of a screenshot of deliberate misinformation. But it's your fault for... um, reasons! Own it!"
Actually decided by whomever is funding the studies..."Studies", in my opinion, have a conclusion before they finish editing the Abstract, whatever conclusion is decided by the authors.
no...Have you seen one where they say, "Man! We were totally wrong, and the opposite is true, can you believe it?!?"
Mike
"Studies", in my opinion, have a conclusion before they finish editing the Abstract, whatever conclusion is decided by the authors. Have you seen one where they say, "Man! We were totally wrong, and the opposite is true, can you believe it?!?"
Your point? This thread (the one we're posting in here) is the example of gullibility and confirmation bias, not the link debunking the false assertion that France has passed an anti mRNA law.
Here's another link about the proposed law in France.
https://bnnbreaking.com/politics/ne...regulated-therapeutic-camps-and-new-age-gurus
Here are 400+ covid studies retracted after publication because of concerns of the scientific community, not necessarily the authors, about their veracity.
https://retractionwatch.com/retracted-coronavirus-covid-19-papers/
Innuendo is used to pin the cause of these so-called new clots (no real evidence yet that these are new or different, just anecdote) on vaccination, and apparently correlation is causation. Then there is the embalmer's statement about new, fast progressing cancers he's heard about:Dr. Campbell's video doesn't state that Covid is the cause. The embalmer just states that he hasn't seen this type of clot before 2021.
I agree with you here, and AI is going to make it even harder to verify.That also gives you an idea how many of these publications are around. Unfortunately, there aren't that many scientists around who have time to check all these publications. So, 400 retracted is probably just the tip of the iceberg.
Science isn't easy. Working together is even harder. And when emotions, ambitions and politics are mixed in, it's a wonder some scientists can do what they do...
#brandolinislawOh, but I guess there won't be any evidence because of the massive coverup perpetrated by everyone, (including everyone in science, government, the police, and even me), except the embalmers.
Well, I wasted my time watching the whole thing (Brandolini's Law - thanks Matador) and it made me more nauseated than anything else. Seems like a bunch of folks here (and in the world) could use a huge dose of cop on.You could do with a dose of 'cop-on' yourself Doc , Roz and Dr Campbells podcast made the hairs stand on the back of your neck ,I bet . You obviously couldnt stomach more than a few minutes and your response is coming directly from the 'fight or flight' part of the brain , not the rational side .
I agree - until there is any documented evidence that these clots are different from those in the past, and that they are antemortem and contributed to death, discussion is useless. The concept that a cover up of this is even possible beggars belief.Simplify:
What are these people seeing?
Can these people be trusted with their observation?
When did these observations first occur?
How many of these observations do we see?
I don't think there is much to be discussed here.
Enter your email address to join: