I make no such claim. In fact regarding audibility of components I learned decades ago that I could measure differences that I couldn't hear, and never heard a difference that I couldn't measure (while I did roll some of my own custom test equipment back in the 70s).Shattersignal said:"
Here's the analogy:
Presumably you can taste the difference between extremely similar batches of wine grapes, even when others cannot. Likewise, there are people who can hear the difference between (*wildly* different) capacitors compositions within the same circuit, even when those capacitors are of the same value and "ought" to perform identically.
Life on the interwebs... We have rules against personal attacks, but attacking ideas are fair game. This is not a safe space but better behaved than many around the WWW.Clearly you would agree, since you've spent time advising folks about the parts spec in their commercial designs? So then why all the trolling from folks when I show up to discuss the differences between caps? Some of the replies on this thread have been downright rude. JR, I see you have more to offer here than simple trolling and argumentation by contradiction and I respect your thoughts and experience.
I don't design mics, but I have used truckloads of capacitors in decades of designing many audio products. My favorite small signal caps back in the day were polystyrene, but they do not survive modern manufacturing processes. Today the goto capacitor for linearity is NPO-COG. (Which I already answered.)If you have so much experience spec'ing caps, I would love for you to answer my topic questions in earnest. Only two respondents have done that so far, by actually recommending a cap. Everyone loves to sling the easy stock refutations, but nobody actually wants to respond to the stated thread topic? I'm asking specifically about 100pf-1000pf value capsule coupling caps for a LDC mic.
I'm pretty calm... you are the one who asked to delete your post. 8)An additional note to the naysayers at large: you seem to approach this topic with quite a big chip on your shoulder. Please take a step back, pause, and calm down a little.
I am trying to be informative.. Like when I first wrote about Capacitors back in the 1980s. Objective metrics exist that fairly characterize the significant behavior of capacitors.I'm not trying to brainwash you with boutique capacitor mumbo-jumbo. If you don't have an answer for me, then just politely move on.
nah... I'll just watch you keep digging your hole...Is this really how this community intends to comport itself? Telling me to perform double blind tests simply avoids my questions. And yes, I have performed double blind tests to guide me in my parts choices so far. If you wish to create a harangue about testing procedures, please start your own thread.
Shattersignal said:...Here's my question to those who care to chime in: in a market rife with excellent foil capacitors, what are our best options for extremely small value caps? What are your favorites? There don't seem to be many options out there and I'd love to know which ones I may have missed...All the other small value caps seem to be just variations on polystyrene, silver mica, or ceramic--all of which I doubt offer anything competitive with the copper and silver foil caps that I love.
Shattersignal said:The big brains have it figured out, so it's time to close the thread: it doesn't matter what cap you pick because they all sound the same.
In other news, all wine tastes like grapes, so please don't use flowery descriptions like "leather," "gunpowder," "minearality." We did some research and it tuns out that it's all made from grapes, you dummy!
Not "extremely small" by any account.Shattersignal said:In particular, I'm tinkering with condenser mic capsule coupling caps, which usually call for extremely small values on the order of 100pf-1000pf.
Ok, maybe you do.All the other small value caps seem to be just variations on polystyrene, silver mica, or ceramic--all of which I doubt offer anything competitive with the copper and silver foil caps that I love. I usually don't love the sound of polymer caps.
*Value* , on its own, means little to nothing.Also, and here's a question specifically for the capacitor mic experts, what effect does the capsule coupling cap value have in the sound of the mic?
I'm working from the assumption that a lower value cap will be more transparent, all other things being equal.
It won´t "outperform" anything, simply changing parts value will change circuit frequency response.This reasoning leads me to wonder whether a smaller valued, lower quality cap, might actually outperform a higher valued, higher quality cap in some situations
See above comments so I don´t repeat the same all the time.--this matter I intend to test by comparing the xxx (1000pf) vs. the xxx (100pf), for instance.
I beg your pardon?Hijack alert? ???
Under your above mentioned circuit requirements, yes, all modern made commercially available will sound the same, emphasis on sound.The big brains have it figured out, so it's time to close the thread: it doesn't matter what cap you pick because they all sound the same.
Well, you don´t accept answers which don´t match your preconceived ideas, so suggesting a Scientifically valid test and hope you decide by yourself is State of the Art.Telling me to perform double blind tests simply avoids my questions.
I see it, but what tells you it´s caused by the capacitor and not some distortion already present in the sinewave?CJ said:
ok we found a scope shot of the good cap, now all we have to do is find a scope shot of the bad cap in the same circuit location,
you can see a hint of the distortion on the upper right crest.
ruffrecords said:It has recently been discovered that there are a number of genes that determine how good out=r sense of smell is. It is a fact that some people are able to smell things that most people cannot. I saw a report of a woman who can reliably detect certain kinds of cancer.
Maybe there are genes that influence our ability to hear. May there are some poor souls who can actually hear a difference in subtle component changes that the rest of us cannot.
Would you care to explain why, and what methodology leads to that conclusion?moamps said:My favorite capacitor type in a capsule coupling position is cooper foil polystyrene. Soshin silver mica and ERO KC are the next.
abbey road d enfer said:Would you care to explain why
and what methodology leads to that conclusion
Again not apples and oranges (dogs and some animals have remarkable olfactory abilities.)ruffrecords said:It has recently been discovered that there are a number of genes that determine how good out=r sense of smell is. It is a fact that some people are able to smell things that most people cannot. I saw a report of a woman who can reliably detect certain kinds of cancer.
I have been on this hunt for a very long time.... For the sake of argument, let's say there is some audible difference that some lucky soul alone can hear. If this audible difference is real, i.e. makes a physical difference to the signal, we can measure it, characterize it, and manage it. If it isn't real, it isn't real. (I made my own semi-custom test equipment in the 70s to parse out IMD non-linearity that was not revealed by traditional THD, or SMPTE IMD tests).Maybe there are genes that influence our ability to hear. May there are some poor souls who can actually hear a difference in subtle component changes that the rest of us cannot.
Cheers
Ian
For something to be declared "scientific" you need statistical significance which basically means that you have data that shows you get a positive result a certain percentage of the time (usually 95%). Meaning you would have to collect at least 20 measurements and get a positive result 19/20 times. And this assumes that the component that is being tested does not influence other things that could affect the result (like the capacitor just has a different capacitance which all do even of the same type).moamps said:There was no any repetitive scientific methodology involved, just extensive listening tests (this is also sort of scientific methodology, isn't?)
I like Guinness stout better than many beers, but never tasted the mother's milk fresh where it's made. I did find Guinness in bottles in Hong Kong so that didn't suck.moamps said:No. The next question might be why I don't like Guinness. 8)
JohnRoberts said:I brew my own beer that blows the doors off what I can buy locally. But that is like home made bread vs store bought, no comparison.
Coors "lite" is redundant, and also affectionately known as rocky mountain pisswater...abbey road d enfer said:My biggest disappointment is not with beer; I like Coor's Lite
I drank too much Dos to complain about it now, but not a great beer (better ad campaign)and Dos Equis (XX),
Alcoholic cider is a relatively new beverage category here (flavored water with booze added), and not remotely the fermented apple cider of yore. Back in the 60s I fermented a gallon of apple cider in my dorm room that kicked it, but over the years it becomes harder to get fresh cider that doesn't have preservatives in it, that kill the yeast. Ironically perhaps farmers used to ferment surplus apples and apple jack, an apple whisky that came from that surplus fermentation.but cider in the US is a big turn-down. I was in a restaurant in Connecticut, asked for cider and it was strange to say the least. When I complained they told me I should have asked for "hard" cider. OK, lesson learned.
Beer is better but it's not beer o'clock yet, soon. 8)After that I tried what passes for cider in other places, in the end the only one I find (just) acceptable is the Strongbow. Even the "belgian style" Stella Artois tastes like DR Pepper to me.
So now, what about returning to capacitors?
I've made some nice ciders over the years if i can get my hands on some raw unadulterated apple cider, but harder and harder to come by these days.Tubetec said:Slightly more cordial atmos now the convo's turned to the demon drink ,
We used have a great selection of English ciders here once upon a time ,but since Bulmers went mass market many of the good dry english ciders arent marketed here anymore . Bulmers is more sickly sweet coulored water ,very little real apple taste .
There are a couple of nice small volume cider producers here ,costly though. My buddy made a few gallons of proper old style cider last year , tastewise it was a revelation ,there was a little sediment in the end ,but partially freezing the bottles then decanting fixed that and upped the % too .
I never appreciated Weissbier despite too many messes to count. The one time I had a weissbier that hit the spot was in atlanta, ga on the 4th of july with a slice of lemon. ;DI'm just trying out a new Weissbier from Lidl ,Patronus , its a high quality Munchen brau, E1.49 a 500ml bottle and at 5.5% packs a punch too.
Sam Adams is well above average for a mass market US beer and they make several different styles (bud is the only US rice beer AFAIK). Of course the micro brew/pub trend is well established here, but IMO they tend to over hop stuff, maybe so the newbies can taste a difference. IPA is popular (why?). India Pale Ale is over hopped and high alcohol to survive a long ocean voyage to like India, not to taste good. :Most of the 'usual suspect' US beers available here are as you describe John , 'pishwater'. I did try the Sam Adams ,I think its called ,a Bostonian brew ,wasnt bad actually ,a lot more robust flavourwise than the rice beers.
Enter your email address to join: