bitman
Well-known member
I put win 7 on a single core 3 gig P4 today and even installed it on a POS 30gb Maxtor Pata drive and win 7 is snappy fast. Vista plods along like you are in glue that is hardening. I think this is going to be a hit.
barclaycon said:Mr. Moby.
Vista 'sounds' better than XP ?
Would you care to explain that!
Simply, did you tried to run same DAW with same plugs uner XP and Vista and OS X , to bounce them than to compare? Most of the people think that it's just matter of look or feel but there is sonics difference. Since I prefer mac from OS9 to OS x , Vista sounds bit closer to that. Capisci?barclaycon said:Mr. Moby.
Vista 'sounds' better than XP ?
Would you care to explain that!
Moby said:No I'm not ;D Of course I'm not talking about PT HD with his own DSP engine. I'm talking about Cubase, Nuendo and older versions of Logic.
I agree, Audiofools are simply audiofools.There's a whole ridiculous world of audiophiles who are being cheated or kid themselves to doing/buying ridiculous things based on mere beliefs. I was hoping it would not be the case here, where people actually build projects, and maybe somewhat understand the way they work.
There is no magic just sounds different, and when something is slightly different you have opportunity to choose what you like better. You are not the first person who don't believe that operating systems sounds different, but, you just have to try , forget about 1 and 0 and use your ears. Since you can bounce from different systems you can later do the "blind test". I will really appreciate if you can tell me what's going on (since you are in programming). I would like to save some bucks using cheap windoze but I would like to have same sonics like osxExample, when you understand how a stock-standard regulated PSU works, why would you still buy a $4000 IEC cable? The same applies equally to audio DSP and the processes involved. Being a DSP programmer, I simply cannot kid myself to believe the same software on two different operating systems will magically sound different. Honestly, there is no magic involved, or blackvoodoo elves either.
Moby said:There is no magic just sounds different, and when something is slightly different you have opportunity to choose what you like better. You are not the first person who don't believe that operating systems sounds different, but, you just have to try , forget about 1 and 0 and use your ears. Since you can bounce from different systems you can later do the "blind test". I will really appreciate if you can tell me what's going on (since you are in programming). I would like to save some bucks using cheap windoze but I would like to have same sonics like osx ;
Kingston said:There absolutely no need for any "blind tests" here.
When you have two audio files that are bit by bit equal, and you still hear a difference between them, there's is obviously magic involved.
mcs said:Doesn't XP resample everything to 48kHz with the default config?
Kingston said:mcs said:Doesn't XP resample everything to 48kHz with the default config?
no, of course it doesn't. (some crap creative labs sound card back ten years a go might have done that.)
Old beliefs die hard.
Simply, did you tried to run same DAW with same plugs uner XP and Vista and OS X , to bounce them than to compare? Most of the people think that it's just matter of look or feel but there is sonics difference. Since I prefer mac from OS9 to OS x , Vista sounds bit closer to that. Capisci?
mcs said:I have no idea what they were doing wrong (I have never used XP, or any Windows never than 3.1), but don't say it doesn't happen![]()
Enter your email address to join: