And not necessary to do another between RD and RBK?
Why would i have kept that piece of information obscured, IF it was essential?
And not necessary to do another between RD and RBK?
Many times I didn't even put these inductors.Hello, Everyone,
Trying to wrap up a pair of M version PCB builds and I somehow forgot to order the 47uH inductors even though I remember clearly thinking I needed to make sure that I don't forget them since I did not have any on hand. The ones I do have laying around are 4.7uH. I noticed in the Version 16 schematic that L1,2 positions were sometimes bridged for certain versions. I am just wondering if using this low of a value will either create an undesired filter effect or if there will be insufficient EMI suppression.
Thanks!
Paul
Did you notice any unwanted effects such and RF interference when using a jumper instead?Many times I didn't even put these inductors.
In short, No.Did you notice any unwanted effects such and RF interference when using a jumper instead?
Thanks!
Paul
Good to know. Thanks!In short, No.
I have never had any problems with RF interference although there is a local FM radio station nearby (which I personally founded in 1996 ) which has 100W power in the antenna. In addition, I live surrounded by dozens of wi-fi routers, and probably hundreds of switching sources of devices,several cable television networks and towers with mobile phone antennas.
In addition, I live in a block built over 60 years ago and the grounding of the electrical network is no longer efficient.
If you refer to the polarization voltage of the capsule: in point 6.Where on this board would I measure to verify the polarization voltage?
The vintage version U87i has lower sensitivity than the current version U87ai, and than other modern condenser microphones, ie it provides a lower output level, the gain of the preamplifier will have to be increased.Gotcha. Based on that I was able to measure it. I was trying out a small daughter board that would increase the polarization voltage from 48 to 60V but in my situation it didn't really make much of a difference (in terms of increasing sensitivity of the mic). I still have to crank my preamp way up before it matches my other microphones' sensitivity.
increase the polarization voltage from 48 to 60V but in my situation it didn't really make much of a difference (in terms of increasing sensitivity of the mic).
Or, maybe the ORS 87 ... did I see somewhere that someone had figured out how to get more sensitivity out of that build?
ORS87 is cardioid only.Right. Maybe I should restore this back to the stock D-87 circuit and just sell it off and build another Fuchs u87a? Or, maybe the ORS 87 ... did I see somewhere that someone had figured out how to get more sensitivity out of that build?
Not in a hurry. I’m just not impressed at all with the low output of the D87 and would like to improve it.How big of a hurry are you in?
I’d do that if I’d get a good volume/sensitivity boost. Cardioid is the only pattern I’d use with the mic anyway. For now, it sits in the case doing nothing. I’ve got other mics that handle the other polar patterns.ORS87 is cardioid only.
If it is enough for your studio purposes, then you can easily convert D-87 into ORS87, using the same electronic/mechanical construction, (body, pcb, capsule),
giving up some components and connections.
You don't have to invest a cent more.
The ORS87 has better sensitivity than the D-87, in fact it is comparable to current condenser microphones.Not in a hurry. I’m just not impressed at all with the low output of the D87 and would like to improve it.
I’d do that if I’d get a good volume/sensitivity boost. Cardioid is the only pattern I’d use with the mic anyway. For now, it sits in the case doing nothing. I’ve got other mics that handle the other polar patterns.
Sounds like that may be a good direction to go with this particular build then. I'll have to study up more on that circuit and see what I'd need to do to implement it on this PCB ... unless that's already been done somewhere.The ORS87 has better sensitivity than the D-87, in fact it is comparable to current condenser microphones.
That's exactly what I was trying to explain to you.Sounds like that may be a good direction to go with this particular build then. I'll have to study up more on that circuit and see what I'd need to do to implement it on this PCB ... unless that's already been done somewhere.
Probably simple for you.That's exactly what I was trying to explain to you.
You have already built the ORS87 in the D-87 circuit. You just have to give up some components, that is, break/modify some connections. Very simple!
The easiest way is to draw the changes on the D-87 diagram (delete unnecessary components, parts and connections to transform into ORS87)Probably simple for you.
I glanced through the ORS87 thread just now looking for schematics and there are a few variations posted out there. I think I must not understand enough how microphone circuits work yet to be able to deconstruct the D87.