No, I'm just delivering what people originally paid for, and late. That's not a good thing. At best, I'm breaking even.+5 reputation!
No, I'm just delivering what people originally paid for, and late. That's not a good thing. At best, I'm breaking even.+5 reputation!
I don't have a vintage u87, but I really like the sound of this diy microphone.Yes for vintage mic it is sounds good. Maybe even more warm and clear than original vintage Neumann mic.
It keeps the ring and screws from hitting the side of the basket if the microphone is droppedIs that another saddle on top of the capsule? What is it supposed to do?
Apparently it is a bumper cropping up ... um ... sorry (bad pun.) JamesIt keeps the ring and screws from hitting the side of the basket if the microphone is dropped
Very nice sounding mic!It has been two weeks since I received Arinne's k87 capsule. I put it on my diy u87, I have been looking for a capsule for vintage u87. This k87 did it. It is about 3db more sensitive than the other View attachment 111852k87 I bought before. For the vintage u87 circuit, the signal-to-noise ratio is improved. The diaphragm sound is detailed but not harsh. I also bought Maiku 3U MP capsules before, but none of them satisfied me. MP's capsule is ok for u87ai, but Arienne's k87 is really good. I am so excited that my vintage u87 is finally done. Many thanks to Arienne for her efforts. Below are some build pictures and versions of the drawings, the sound is raw.
View attachment 111858
Interesting: I didn't expect that might higher frequency lift (2k to 5k) in the original as compared to what I heard amongst some originals.Here's SQ's "flat" k47 (red) against original Neumann's k47(blue).
Yes, the measurement is taken in acoustically neutral body without headbasket. I take all capsule measurements this way. The measurement also matches published Neumann's k47 response, for example the one of m147.Interesting: I didn't expect that might higher frequency lift (2k to 5k) in the original as compared to what I heard amongst some originals.
These are A/B swapped into the exact same.mike?
Thats great info an thanks for taking the time to provide this. The response is flatter but improvement technically on paper does not always equal improvement.Major update:
Here's SQ's "flat" k47 (red) against original Neumann's k47(blue). I honestly believe Ari's capsule is improvement on the design. 180° rejection is even better than the original. The shape is spot on, it's just that flat k47 is gentler in the midrange.
Yes, the measurement is taken in acoustically neutral body without headbasket. I take all capsule measurements this way.
The whole area where i test mics is emi shieldedHow are you able to measure the capsule without headbasket and not have low end hum?
When I do that I always have huge hum in the mics output
Thanks
Not sure what you mean by this. What i write is my own opinion, and i explained in detail in my first post of the thread why i like this capsule just the way it is compared to the original. There are many monkeys around that like to listen and share their opinion, this monkey here is the only one that shares measurements taken under controlled conditions so average DIYer can easily see what the difference is. Cheers.I believe you refer to us as the "monkey see monkey do" but I'm also a "monkey listen and monkey understand" why I like something.
Enter your email address to join: