SSLtech
Well-known member
Evenin' all...
Someone just asked me if it would be possible to "dial in" a variable amount of crossover distortion... I reflexively replied that it SHOULD be pretty straightforward... but so far i havent been able to visualize how this would be done.
I'm thinking a symettically-increasing "chopping the base off the mountain" to leave the 'peaks' over the raising (in both poles symmetrically) in hte same places... which would be like a fast on-off "gate" kind of circuit, or a lternatively "lowering" the peaks by subtracting the base.... or possibly asymmetrical operation, or 'forward-phase-dimmer' triac-like behavior, where only the leading crossover 'corner' is chopped.
I'm intrigued now, and I'm wondering what a simple/elegant approach might look like.
PS: How's it going, everyone?
Keef
Someone just asked me if it would be possible to "dial in" a variable amount of crossover distortion... I reflexively replied that it SHOULD be pretty straightforward... but so far i havent been able to visualize how this would be done.
I'm thinking a symettically-increasing "chopping the base off the mountain" to leave the 'peaks' over the raising (in both poles symmetrically) in hte same places... which would be like a fast on-off "gate" kind of circuit, or a lternatively "lowering" the peaks by subtracting the base.... or possibly asymmetrical operation, or 'forward-phase-dimmer' triac-like behavior, where only the leading crossover 'corner' is chopped.
I'm intrigued now, and I'm wondering what a simple/elegant approach might look like.
PS: How's it going, everyone?
Keef