user 37518
Well-known member
I suggest using arguments rather than mocking.
He said no such thing. He said:Saying someone needs to take their crazy meds,
Whether or not there is a shortage of medication(s) is just an objective fact, is it not?And I thought the shortages of anti-psychotic meds had been resolved...
You well know that he was sarcastic and offensive, don't try to be witty. Lets get back on topic, rather than detouring into childish games. Its like a child who throws an insult at "Joe" and when Joe says something back, the child says "I wasn't referring to you, you are not the only Joe in the world, isn't it? I meant another Joe" come on now.He said no such thing. He said:
Whether or not there is a shortage of medication(s) is just an objective fact, is it not?
Dully noted."If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck"
Yep. Except there are a lot of people who don't really know anything about ducks, but think they do. Their observations about waterfowl deserve to be questioned. Then there are the perpetual gaslighters who keep trying to convince you that the duck you saw was merely a grouse or perhaps a pheasant."If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck"
I would certainly argue both--a combination of pandering and self-interest. It sort of puts the whole "liberal media" notion in a different light. It's hard to argue that much of the liberal agenda really benefits the wealthiest Americans. So insomuch as the media promote a liberal agenda, it's likely pandering--or giving the people what they want, if you prefer. And if more media outlets have a liberal slant (outside of issues important to the ultra-wealthy), then maybe it's because more folks want to hear the liberal POV than the conservative?It is unclear whether the newspapers control modern sentiment or public sentiment control the newspapers, but it no coincidence that wealthy people buy influential newspapers to use those megaphones to push their personal agenda.
Well user 37518 , seems like youve backed yourself into a corner now picking arguments with practically anyone who responds to your posts , not only that but youve shown a total lack of empathy and understanding .
If your opinion of the people here is that low , my suggestion is pack your trunk and say good bye to the circus ,
You might need to brush up on your facts. Relative to the average US adult The Guardian is further left than Fox News is to the right.Actually they are good reporting facts. But some people here some to get their "news" from pretty questionable sources. You guys moved to the right for decades now. Unfortunate.
Right on!Wrong , you backed yourself into the corner , you didnt need my help at all .
Believe me I can be a lot more abrasive , but you know what I wont bother because thats exactly what your fishing for . Seems to me you've more or less insulted everyone , the vast majority simply expressing their opinion in a reasonable manner , you took offence at every turn and responded in a needlessly viscious manner to several people who tabled subjects that didnt suit your agenda .
Just because you started this thread doesnt mean you have a monopoly on peoples right to express themselves in it .
Probably the same kind that Pfizer used to promise that vaccines would stop the infection.
To my knowledge this is social media misinformation. Maybe you could post a link documenting that this was "promised" by Pfizer.
"A spokesperson from Pfizer told Full Fact by email: “The primary endpoints of our Covid-19 vaccine study were to evaluate the efficacy of the vaccine candidate in preventing Covid-19 disease in participants who had not been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus before they received the vaccine […]The trials were not designed to evaluate the vaccine’s effectiveness against transmission of SARS-CoV-2.”
The fact that the Covid-19 vaccines did have an impact on transmission, particularly against the earliest variants, was verified with real world data after the vaccines were rolled out. Although the impact of vaccines on transmission has lessened against the Omicron variant, this does not mean that the vaccines impacting transmission was just a “myth” or “assumption”."
https://fullfact.org/health/coronavirus-vaccine-pfizer-transmission-test/
Sorry, not Pfizer, but the actual government of the USA, which is worse, here is more "misinformation":
I stop reading this poop a long time ago...(Hey John, this is entertaining, but I expect you'll be locking this thread pretty soon. )
I did recognize it wasn't Pfizer, but for you guys, recognizing your mistakes seems to be out of the question.Right on!
If anyone wants to discuss ignorance, peruse these posts from another thread.
So here is an ignorant post, with wrong information which probably came from other ignorant posts on social media, and passed on to the gullible public, many of whom only accept beliefs that align with their confirmation bias. And we wonder why society is so fucked up these days.
(Hey John, this is entertaining, but I expect you'll be locking this thread pretty soon. )
Exactly how did I insult anyone? I never used insults, again, for you, the left, facts are insults. I believe my language is not offensive, I have been respectful, but I have been very forward regarding my opinions. Read my posts and let me know where have I been so insulting. You, on the other hand, have been looking for anything to attack, either the Vatican, or the pope, whilst playing the "I am not really interested on arguing" card; throwing stones, and then hidding your hand behind your back.Wrong , you backed yourself into the corner , you didnt need my help at all .
Believe me I can be a lot more abrasive , but you know what I wont bother because thats exactly what your fishing for . Seems to me you've more or less insulted everyone , the vast majority simply expressing their opinion in a reasonable manner , you took offence at every turn and responded in a needlessly viscious manner to several people who tabled subjects that didnt suit your agenda .
Just because you started this thread doesnt mean you have a monopoly on peoples right to express themselves in it .
Well, to my knowledge this wouldn't have caused a cerebral aneurism, but the stress of what was happening, and possibly the med withdrawal, could have caused a rise in blood pressure that ruptured the aneurism. I'm sorry this happened to her, and that sometimes the practice of medicine is so fucked up (damn! there's that profanity again) that it causes more harm than good. My wife had a ruptured aneurism/subarachnoid bleed 18 years ago now, and luckily it was witnessed, she was taken to ER and flown nearby to one of the best neurological facilities in the country where she got excellent treatment, and after coiling the aneurism, a VP shunt, several weeks in the ICU, and months in the hospital and rehab, she made a complete recovery.She tried to confront her siblings about what happened , the day she died the family were due to arrive with the doctor and ambulance to take her away again . Years and years of psych meds had destroyed her body , in the end the sheer terror of being taken away and locked up caused her to have some kind of brain aneurysm .
I agree with you. Most healthcare professionals are doing their best (there's a lot we don't know, especially about psychiatric issues), but unfortunately there are some that are avaricious or incompetent, as in just about every walk of life.One thing we probably can agree on Doc is sudden withdrawl from these meds can be extremely dangerous , in her case she may well have been better off staying on a reduced dose rather than having to gone cold turkey . She wasnt ever offered any form of councilling to help her come to terms with what she'd been through , just meds to zonk her out .
Her story isnt unique by any means , I have several other friends who suffered abuse at the hands of a family member , and the same thing exactly happened , labeled as mad and medicated , where in reality what they needed was acknowledgement of what happened to start the process of rebuilding their lives .
I did recognize it wasn't Pfizer, but for you guys, recognizing your mistakes seems to be out of the question.
And yet, here you are, continuing a conversation about not wanting to continue a conversation, and attacking others.
Sorry - it was more than I could bear.
Enter your email address to join: