The thing that sparked this thread was people speculating that the BBC dropped it because of the lyrics.
The BBC has consistently said that they didn't want to put a bunch of singers on stage. They said it again when they announced the reversal of their decision:
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-53998584
It's not like the BBC issued conflicting reports about why it was doing the songs as instrumentals. And instead of just believing the BBC about the safety concerns during a goddamn pandemic and not asking some singers to put their livelihoods in danger because everyone couldn't just sing at home, a bunch of people now get to claim that they won some sort of victory against people who were just making stuff up in the first place. I mean, I'm sure they'll test everyone who is going to be performing and the chance of them infecting or being infected is probably low*, but it really is just selfish to ask singers to put themselves on the line to keep everyone from singing at home on their own. Doesn't sound like much of a victory to me, defeating an enemy that doesn't exist and putting people in danger needlessly.
My questions are: Why didn't people just believe the BBC when they said it wasn't some "woke madness" as the title claims but simple safety concerns? Why is the BBC's official statement less convincing than random people online people who don't work there? Any why was the seemingly only acceptable solution for some people to have real live humans on stage singing?
*EDIT: I feel I need to acknowledge that you folks are doing better than many parts of the U.S. right now, but it still feels like unnecessary danger to me.