[quote author="khstudio"]There's a BYPASS for comparing.[/quote]
Sure, but as we know boosting any band increases level so makes most of whatever boosting was done 'better' in our perception.
Hence the 'need' for a level-adjustment to make a fair judgement possible: was the new non-flat EQ-setting really an improvement or did it sound better because it was louder ? (sanity check)
Actually strange the original didn't already have this...
Adding a level-control (1) would have been easy (so a plus), (2) would have changed the 'original' appearance (negative) and (3) would have given an even more cramped front panel (negative), but (4) would have made it easier to spot the versions of the eBay-cigarette-lighter-solder-cloners (positive side effect)...
#3 - I THINK it's just Pending.
OK, I understand. The rear panel legending seems indeed more solid evidence than the sweetwater-quote.
#4 - I'm not sure I should say this or not but Nightpro (or at least the "AIR" technology) was purchased by BOSE.
Then that must be because of a granted patent I guess, otherwise I don't see why they would transfer any money.
Note this is meant in all respect: it's not clear to me what kind of 'technology ' is going on here. Active filter design as we knew it already I'd say. Mackie had something of 'air' as well (15kHz bandpass I thought) and ther have been more ideas towards the same goal.
But the patent-world etc can be strange, so who knows. And please ignore the fact that I have the bad habit of being a bit itchy about people calling obvious things 'a new technique'
Since the word is out there already, where did you hear about this ?
Regards,
Peter