Antagonist in Chief

[AnalogPackrat]

Ok so as long as he says things because they appear vs what the truth is, even though you hate him, we will pretend to like him. That’s rather far fetched. He is been away from position that any comments are at best assumptions and or speculations.

The same thing happened with "Bomb Bomb Iran" McCain. He was absolutely reviled by the left in 2008, but a great hero the last year of his life. The left have no firm guiding principles other than staying in power and controlling everyone. That realization finally began to dawn on me over a decade ago. That moral relativism explain an awful lot about this odd behavior.

 

[AnalogPackrat]

Did he do any illegal activity, as proven in court, that I’m unaware of? If the answer is no, then my answer is no, I wouldn’t do it. I can wait until the regular election cycle; rather than waste more money.

Recalls can be for incompetency. Or lack of leadership in the face of serious problems. How much more money is wasted by leaving Newsom in power?

Of course not. He’s too left for me. However, he’d meet his match running in a national election for anything, with those way too right for me.

A lot of people thought the same about Kamala, Becerra, etc. Failing to act can turn out worse than making a bad decision. Waiting for the perfect candidate to come along is a losing proposition. But apparently apathy rules.

 

[Recording Engineer]

Ok so as long as he says things because they appear vs what the truth is, even though you hate him, we will pretend to like him. That’s rather far fetched. He is been away from position that any comments are at best assumptions and or speculations.

But we don’t know what the truth is, as presented in court. Because of that, we don’t say anything based on what we do know? Of course not! The argument is absolutely ridiculous. And in this case, we know more so far than usual.

 

[Recording Engineer]

The same thing happened with "Bomb Bomb Iran" McCain. He was absolutely reviled by the left in 2008, but a great hero the last year of his life.

2008 he was running for president and that was after 8-years of a president on the right. Of course every ugly political tactic from both sides was turned up to 11! Game-on as usual. Nothing new. The last year of his life, cancer ridden, I believe the game was over.

Same can be said for the Bush/Clinton friendship. The game is over. Another breath of fresh air!

The left have no firm guiding principles other than staying in power and controlling everyone. That realization finally began to dawn on me over a decade ago. That moral relativism explain an awful lot about this odd behavior.

Nothing more than political rhetoric here, as usual. All can and do play that game. Nothing to see here.

 

[Recording Engineer]

Recalls can be for incompetency.

Legally, yes. However, again, it’s all in the eye of the beholder, with an extremely-powerful political lens, so I’m not interested.

Or lack of leadership in the face of serious problems.

Yes, but it’s still with political risk, that is critically considered by the parties. And again, unless it’s illegal problems, I’m not interested.

A lot of people thought the same about Kamala, Becerra, etc. Failing to act can turn out worse than making a bad decision. Waiting for the perfect candidate to come along is a losing proposition. But apparently apathy rules.

Anyone can say the same with Trump or anyone else. It’s a lame argument. It’s dead in the water.

 

[Gold]

had msnbc on in the shop tonight. The same folks who were unhappy with bill burr for how he handled the Robert muller investigation are now all fawning over him like a school girl in the height of beatle mania. All because he said things they like.

What’s wrong with that? When you disagree you say so and when you agree you say so. It doesn’t seem any different than Fox praising Joe Manchin when he gums up the Democrats work and slam him when he doesn’t.

My take on Barr is that he is an institutionalist with an expansive view on the.power of the presidency. Previous defenses had to do more with the office of the President than the occupant of the office.

 

[pucho812]

But we don’t know what the truth is, as presented in court. Because of that, we don’t say anything based on what we do know? Of course not! The argument is absolutely ridiculous. And in this case, we know more so far than usual.

Leaked photos and hearsay as leaked out by the doj is hardly a bench mark for the truth.

 

[pucho812]

What’s wrong with that? When you disagree you say so and when you agree you say so. It doesn’t seem any different than Fox praising Joe Manchin when he gums up the Democrats work and slam him when he doesn’t.

Stand for something or fall for everything.

 

[Recording Engineer]

Better yet: Stand for something and suppress all senses against, under circumstances that might say otherwise, to help fall for everything the team says.

Whatever helps one sleep at night… I’m doing this for the greater good. I’m doing this for the greater good. Compartmentalization is a wonderful thing.

 

[Recording Engineer]

Leaked photos and hearsay as leaked out by the doj is hardly a bench mark for the truth.

What about what I said, says it is?

 

[pucho812]

What about what I said, says it is?

“We know more so far then usual” sounds like you already have him convicted.

 

[JohnRoberts]

I am repeating myself but don't take the bait (from both sides)... this is not productive.

JR

 

[hodad]

And so the John Durham investigation....which, just you wait, he's gonna blow the lid off everything!!!!!........concludes not with a bang but a whimper. I could say I told you so, but......

And oh, yeah, I've been utterly remiss in not mentioning all those well-off white Mississippians stealing millions in federal welfare money from the very many needy people in the poorest state in the US. It's hard work stealing from the poor, but somebody's gotta do it...right?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2022/09/14/brett-favre-phil-bryant-welfare/

 

[JohnRoberts]

And so the John Durham investigation....which, just you wait, he's gonna blow the lid off everything!!!!!........concludes not with a bang but a whimper. I could say I told you so, but......

Congrats... That grand jury term has expired.

Durham is doing typical lawerly things , in a filing to the Danchenko trial he reveals that Danchenko was a paid informant working for the FBI. His trial scheduled for next month is regarding 5 counts of lying to the FBI. This filing is a legal strategy to get evidence into the public record. (This is the same strategy used by the Epstein crowd to slime Alan Dershowitz with claims made in court filings that would be libelous as public statements. )

I heard in a separate case that the judge dismissed Trump's lawsuit against the Clinton campaign, and DNC... so congrats again.

It should have been clear from Comey's pronouncements that the DOJ had no interest in going after their own peeps.

And oh, yeah, I've been utterly remiss in not mentioning all those well-off white Mississippians stealing millions in federal welfare money from the very many needy people in the poorest state in the US. It's hard work stealing from the poor, but somebody's gotta do it...right?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2022/09/14/brett-favre-phil-bryant-welfare/

As so often thanks for thinking of us , I didn't click (I'm not a football fan.)

If you want to embarrass me about MS, there were just arrests made regarding a human trafficking ring that had miscreants operating across several southern states (TX. AL,LA, and MS). They should all burn in hell.... these middlemen traffickers get paid something like $2500 per illegal they transport. How much money are the coyotes and cartels making?

Maybe we should close the border?

JR

 

[hodad]

slime Alan Dershowitz

Dershowitz has done an excellent job of sliming himself, but I'm sure you didn't notice.

I didn't click (I'm not a football fan.)

Apparently you are a poverty fan, though, as you seem to care not at all about 77 million dollars being stolen from the poorest residents of your state. I commend your callousness, and your eagerness to use even the lamest excuse to avoid learning the truth about what's going on in your state (seriously, this has been going on for a while. Where have you been?)

 

[scott2000]

you,you,your,your,your,you....

I think Dr.Phil advises against this...lol

 

[Recording Engineer]

So what’s up with people, such as Graham and Trump saying: “There will be violence if…”?

Is it a threat? A hope? A call to supporters? All the above? A warning for prevention?

Does anyone here support such madness?

 

[JohnRoberts]

no... violence is not the answer... Politicians are blowhards.

JR

 

[JohnRoberts]

Dershowitz has done an excellent job of sliming himself, but I'm sure you didn't notice.


Apparently you are a poverty fan, though, as you seem to care not at all about 77 million dollars being stolen from the poorest residents of your state. I commend your callousness, and your eagerness to use even the lamest excuse to avoid learning the truth about what's going on in your state (seriously, this has been going on for a while. Where have you been?)

Since you claim to know what I am thinking you must know how I feel about your comments.

JR

 

[Recording Engineer]

no... violence is not the answer... Politicians are blowhards.

JR

Unfortunately, it seems more and more people do not agree. How far are words of such, to no longer support a candidate?